#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 examples from this thread
[ QUOTE ]
Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What about the WSOP promo . . . -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Several sites had WSOP promos. [/ QUOTE ] My point here was that they'd have other famous promos. [ QUOTE ] Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If she wanted to "note of the change from the easiest bonus to clear to a more difficult bonus to clear" then she should just note it. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- That's the way I read her post. I believe your inferences are affected by your opinion of her. [/ QUOTE ] It's reasons like this that she should just state what she means. These kooky questions with underlying implications are the original source of the issue. [ QUOTE ] I haven't known her to lie. [/ QUOTE ] And I have. Either believe me or not. Even I'm not going to air this dirty laundry. [ QUOTE ] ??? Do you mean on her website? It is a commercial site, she can delete (censor) whatever she wants. Like 2 + 2, there is absolutely no obligation be concerned with "freedom of speech" issues. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not one to think that freedom of speech applies here. But when she deletes legit posts just because they don't reflect on her advertisers well, I don't think that's decent, regardless of whether she has the "right" to or not. [ QUOTE ] You are going on an image [/ QUOTE ] Yes, I'm going on an image of someone who lies, inappropriately censors, and spams. I wouldn't trust her w/20 FPPs much less "significant sums of money." But that's just me. To each his own. |
|
|