#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any reviews of Ladbrokes?
Just USA. But if you are planning to play bigger game i.e 100 200 fixed or 15/30plo games are sometimes very hard. And full of Swedish and Finnish pros, dont about the lower games tho.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any reviews of Ladbrokes?
[ QUOTE ]
Just USA. But if you are planning to play bigger game i.e 100 200 fixed or 15/30plo games are sometimes very hard. And full of Swedish and Finnish pros, dont about the lower games tho. [/ QUOTE ] The number of pros per shoal of fish is wildly much higher in Europe than in the US. Add to this the fact that americans have a higher disposable income, and you really want american fish. That said the low limit games at Ladbrokes are (were?) truly No Fold'em. It's sportsbooks bettors trying out a new thing. A lot like Pacific when you think about it, people with no real knowledge of poker being sucked in. Also the software sucks. So, alot like Pacific. They use the same software as the Prima skins, but they don't share a network. It looks like a prima skin, it's the same software, but it's not a prima skin. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any reviews of Ladbrokes?
I play on Ladbrooks purely for the MTT Tournaments which are awesome. Players are terrible (like the worst you can hope to find) and you get a really good selection of buy ins. I dont like the ring games because there is never a good table selelction.
|
|
|