Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-19-2005, 06:11 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default % for set over set?

Hey guys, i wa sjust wonderin how often a set over set happens and if there is any reason to ever fold a bottom set on a ragged board ?

i was playin a live game yesterday (.5/1$ blinds) and bought in for 10$. i turned it into 350-400 within a few hours and slowly dwindled bac tdown to like 150 - but then i hit a set of 4s and lost to set of 9s. do i just lose and say 'it was meant to be' or reanalyze and think of how i could fold? folding = -ev?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-19-2005, 06:13 PM
elus2 elus2 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15
Default Re: % for set over set?

you would need to give more information such as stack sizes, player reads, your own play in the last few rounds, board texture, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-19-2005, 06:21 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: % for set over set?

never fold , -ev
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-19-2005, 06:23 PM
yvesaint yvesaint is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: sittin on my 6xbuy-in stack
Posts: 690
Default Re: % for set over set?

the only time i could consider folding a set against an unknown is if i'm 3-bet pre-flop holding JJ and the board comes AKKQJ
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-19-2005, 08:16 PM
ThaHero ThaHero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles and .25/.50 on PS
Posts: 199
Default Re: % for set over set?

The odds of flopping a set are about 8-1. My math absolutely sucks, but I will take a wild guess and say that the odds of two people flopping one is 20-1? My math may be(and probably is) flawed. Even if it's close, it's so rare that you should never fold a set on a ragged board. If you have some read, suck as a player ONLY raising aces and kings preflop, and he raises and the board come AK6 giving you a set of 6s and he raises your bet, yeah fold. But it better be a really good read.

Just like Harrington said "I'm not good enough to fold Kings preflop, and neither are you." You should use that same train of thinking about sets. Except be cautious on coordinated boards.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-19-2005, 08:22 PM
Mercman572 Mercman572 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 261
Default Re: % for set over set?

[ QUOTE ]
The odds of flopping a set are about 8-1. My math absolutely sucks, but I will take a wild guess and say that the odds of two people flopping one is 20-1?

[/ QUOTE ]

i am not sure but the percentage chance of flopping a set is .12, so since 2 sets are independent events .12*.12= .0144 or a 1.4 percentage chance. or 71-1 but my process might be wrong
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-19-2005, 08:25 PM
Isura Isura is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 69
Default Re: % for set over set?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The odds of flopping a set are about 8-1. My math absolutely sucks, but I will take a wild guess and say that the odds of two people flopping one is 20-1?

[/ QUOTE ]

i am not sure but the percentage chance of flopping a set is .12, so since 2 sets are independent events .12*.12= .0144 or a 1.4 percentage chance. or 71-1 but my process might be wrong

[/ QUOTE ]

1.4% is a much better approximation than 5%.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-19-2005, 09:08 PM
ThaHero ThaHero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles and .25/.50 on PS
Posts: 199
Default Re: % for set over set?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The odds of flopping a set are about 8-1. My math absolutely sucks, but I will take a wild guess and say that the odds of two people flopping one is 20-1?

[/ QUOTE ]

i am not sure but the percentage chance of flopping a set is .12, so since 2 sets are independent events .12*.12= .0144 or a 1.4 percentage chance. or 71-1 but my process might be wrong

[/ QUOTE ]

1.4% is a much better approximation than 5%.

[/ QUOTE ]

At first I multiplied 8 by 8 to get 64-1, but that seemed too high. 20-1 seemed too low. I shoulda just kept my mouth shut.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-19-2005, 10:27 PM
Skuzzy Skuzzy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: % for set over set?

not so easy as others said - think about the chance that another player has a pair to start too. how many players in the game?

Also the chance of flopping a set v set situation negates a paired board. This means that the commonly used 12% or 8.5:1 figures are inaccurate as they are for a set or better. The chance of flopping exactly a set is 10.775%
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-19-2005, 10:34 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: % for set over set?

set over set

first you have to calculate the odds someone else has a pair as well as you--then the odds that person makes a set with you--then the odds you go broke (ie non coordinated boards) it's not that high. I've only been in one such situation in months. (although that was in a situation that my opponent played really weird for three aces... lol)

But I usually fold small pairs against people who I know won't pay a set off unless they have me beat so... lol.

I'd spend a lot more time reanalyzing why you went from 300-400 to 150 as THAT's the problem here way more so then the set.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.