Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-10-2005, 08:07 PM
Ulysses Ulysses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,519
Default OMFG NO-LIMIT POKER PLAYERS ARE SO STUPID

Hand #10101624-2185 at Phillipsburg (No Limit Hold'em)
Powered by UltimateBet
Started at 10/Dec/05 18:59:41

SheFaLLs is at seat 0 with $2869.50.
CzarBushov is at seat 1 with $5804.
akshawnd is at seat 2 with $2567.
storeslem is at seat 3 with $3237.
xpensive is at seat 4 with $8340.
bedeviling is at seat 5 with $5753.
mandmzo is at seat 6 with $1749.50.
INTillerMaN is at seat 7 with $2957.
e8minabs2 is at seat 8 with $1072.
NVader is at seat 9 with $1559.
The button is at seat 3.

xpensive posts the small blind of $10.
bedeviling posts the big blind of $25.

SheFaLLs: -- --
CzarBushov: -- --
akshawnd: Kd Ks
storeslem: -- --
xpensive: -- --
bedeviling: -- --
mandmzo: -- --
INTillerMaN: -- --
e8minabs2: -- --
NVader: -- --

Pre-flop:

mandmzo calls. INTillerMaN folds. e8minabs2 folds.
NVader folds. SheFaLLs folds. CzarBushov raises to
$110. akshawnd re-raises to $390. storeslem folds.
xpensive calls. bedeviling folds. mandmzo folds.
CzarBushov folds.

Flop (board: 8d 5s 3h):

xpensive checks. akshawnd bets $940. xpensive
raises to $3760. akshawnd goes all-in for $2177.
xpensive is returned $1583 (uncalled).

Turn (board: 8d 5s 3h 8h):

(no action in this round)


River (board: 8d 5s 3h 8h 2d):

(no action in this round)




Showdown:

xpensive shows 4c 6h.
xpensive has 4c 6h 5s 3h 2d: straight, six high.
akshawnd shows Kd Ks.
akshawnd has Kd Ks 8d 5s 8h: two pair, kings and eights.


Hand #10101624-2185 Summary:

$3 is raked from a pot of $5294.
xpensive wins $5291 with straight, six high.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-10-2005, 08:10 PM
esbesb esbesb is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10
Default Re: OMFG NO-LIMIT POKER PLAYERS ARE SO STUPID

Don't be so hard on yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-2005, 08:22 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OMFG NO-LIMIT POKER PLAYERS ARE SO STUPID

You do realize he already had ten (10) dollars of his OWN money in the pot right?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2005, 08:51 PM
Pulp Pulp is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: OMFG NO-LIMIT POKER PLAYERS ARE SO STUPID

You clearly got outplayed... he has 14 outs to improve against your 2. Obvious fold on flop.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-10-2005, 09:00 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OMFG NO-LIMIT POKER PLAYERS ARE SO STUPID

Sorry D but you got pwnd
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-10-2005, 09:09 PM
Recliner Recliner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 38
Default Re: OMFG NO-LIMIT POKER PLAYERS ARE SO STUPID

[ QUOTE ]
You clearly got outplayed... he has 14 outs to improve against your 2. Obvious fold on flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm so confused because El Diablo wins this 65.8% (Thanks PokerStove) of the time and was getting about 3.2:1 on calling the push.

I'm hoping you're trying to be sarcastic, but somehow I doubt it as you listed El D with 2 outs while he is ahead and gave his opponent 14. I'm confused as to how you came up with 14 outs for his opponent? The most I could think of would be 10, 2 for runner runner something (and that's being very generous, its more like 1 out) and 8 for the straight draw. If all the cards are known El D has 35 outs. Do you see why?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-10-2005, 10:58 PM
BoxTree BoxTree is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 323
Default Re: OMFG NO-LIMIT POKER PLAYERS ARE SO STUPID

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You clearly got outplayed... he has 14 outs to improve against your 2. Obvious fold on flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm so confused because El Diablo wins this 65.8% (Thanks PokerStove) of the time and was getting about 3.2:1 on calling the push.

I'm hoping you're trying to be sarcastic, but somehow I doubt it as you listed El D with 2 outs while he is ahead and gave his opponent 14. I'm confused as to how you came up with 14 outs for his opponent? The most I could think of would be 10, 2 for runner runner something (and that's being very generous, its more like 1 out) and 8 for the straight draw. If all the cards are known El D has 35 outs. Do you see why?

[/ QUOTE ]

Recliner, you have been Spongerfied in the style of Pulp. Please take "Fenix Down" for remedy.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-10-2005, 11:04 PM
POKhER POKhER is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: .50/1 At Stars - LONDON, UK.
Posts: 590
Default Re: OMFG NO-LIMIT POKER PLAYERS ARE SO STUPID

Dude you suck, Just quit poker and give me your bankroll.

Seriously man, as a friend i think its best for the both of us.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-10-2005, 11:09 PM
Pulp Pulp is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: OMFG NO-LIMIT POKER PLAYERS ARE SO STUPID

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You clearly got outplayed... he has 14 outs to improve against your 2. Obvious fold on flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm so confused because El Diablo wins this 65.8% (Thanks PokerStove) of the time and was getting about 3.2:1 on calling the push.

I'm hoping you're trying to be sarcastic, but somehow I doubt it as you listed El D with 2 outs while he is ahead and gave his opponent 14. I'm confused as to how you came up with 14 outs for his opponent? The most I could think of would be 10, 2 for runner runner something (and that's being very generous, its more like 1 out) and 8 for the straight draw. If all the cards are known El D has 35 outs. Do you see why?

[/ QUOTE ]

lol chill bro i was kidding... you dont have to go poker odds nerd on me
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-11-2005, 10:31 PM
joel2006 joel2006 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: OMFG NO-LIMIT POKER PLAYERS ARE SO STUPID

El D is only getting 2.5 to 1 to call the push (5540 in pot for 2177) just above even money since he's almost a 2:1 fave, but unless he put the raiser on that hand he probably should have folded. But his read was right, then he just got unlucky as hell. I know a little bit about that.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.