|
|
|
|
#1
12-30-2005, 07:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU hand
[ QUOTE ]
By the way how come anyone ever strongly disagrees with my math, their reasoning is "Its too complicated and you obviously dont get it so I won't bother explaining it to you". There is no way in hell limping has a higher expectation than raising, under basically any circumstance in this spot. [/ QUOTE ] Because you always quote #'s as the gospel. Like I said, I ain't gonna waste my time teaching a 20% ROI guy poker. 
|
|
#2
12-30-2005, 08:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: HU hand
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] By the way how come anyone ever strongly disagrees with my math, their reasoning is "Its too complicated and you obviously dont get it so I won't bother explaining it to you". There is no way in hell limping has a higher expectation than raising, under basically any circumstance in this spot. [/ QUOTE ] Because you always quote #'s as the gospel. Like I said, I ain't gonna waste my time teaching a 20% ROI guy poker. [/ QUOTE ] More like 19% ROI after this set..
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
