What is your "world ranking"??? - Page 2

AcesUp · #11 06-21-2005, 12:06 AM

Hey, I'm #71 in the world!

Sweet... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

-Aces

goofball · #12 06-21-2005, 12:47 AM

SUH-WEEET.

986

Dan Burns · #13 06-21-2005, 01:01 AM

Cool. #895 here.

J.Brown · #14 06-21-2005, 01:45 AM

I am in the 700's but they don't have one of my cashes, lol!

it would probably vault me to the 4's or 5's.

nice post, funny stuff. J.

Equal · #15 06-21-2005, 02:05 AM

I wonder if we should maybe rename everyone here to their ranking number. Kind of like the Simpsons Stonecutters episode where the higher ranking person can boss around anyone lower with impunity.

Hmm, now that I actually think about, #1,100 isn't that great and I don't really want to do the bidding of most everyone here lol. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

beachbum · #16 06-21-2005, 02:14 AM

I should be updating the database shortly with the results of the $2500 Limit tourney so everyone's ranking will change. But it'll be fun to check out what your new ranking will be. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

TheBeat · #17 06-21-2005, 02:59 AM

Chit im only 8th i should be a little higher after my WTP tour win

Dan Burns · #18 06-21-2005, 10:59 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I wonder if we should maybe rename everyone here to their ranking number. Kind of like the Simpsons Stonecutters episode where the higher ranking person can boss around anyone lower with impunity.

Hmm, now that I actually think about, #1,100 isn't that great and I don't really want to do the bidding of most everyone here lol. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Patience Monty. Climb the ladder.

DarthIgnurnt · #19 06-22-2005, 12:05 AM

[ QUOTE ]

Patience Monty. Climb the ladder.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nice ...

But about the list ... I don't get it, and there's just too much text on the "about" page for me to read it (plus there's math and math makes me cry).

So, while I'll never qualify for this list, it's good to know that I've made more playing tournament poker in 2005 than the authors of the books I read to learn it.

I.e. How can this possibly be accurate?

Howard Treesong · #20 06-22-2005, 12:59 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I wonder if we should maybe rename everyone here to their ranking number. Kind of like the Simpsons Stonecutters episode where the higher ranking person can boss around anyone lower with impunity.

Hmm, now that I actually think about, #1,100 isn't that great and I don't really want to do the bidding of most everyone here lol. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Being Number 390, I hereby order you to stop whining about the new regime.