are you a folder or a buncher?

[ThaSaltCracka]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
have you ever folded?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. And I do admit it has its benefits. I think crumpling is better, but it is close.

Justin A

[/ QUOTE ]other than time, what possible benefits do you get from the crumple? I mean, rarely when I drop a duece am I concerned about time.

[Justin A]

[ QUOTE ]


other than time, what possible benefits do you get from the crumple? I mean, rarely when I drop a duece am I concerned about time.


[/ QUOTE ]

I don't see any inherent advantage in folding. I think it actually gives you a smaller surface area to grip, and increases chance of making some unfortunate contact.

Folding saves toilet paper, but who cares? The saved time is just a bonus that comes with crumpling.

Justin A

[ThaSaltCracka]

sometimes when you bunch, you get some weak pockets that tear easily or aren't as thick as they should be. Also, the surface area is akwardly shaped. Folding gives you a nice rectangle.

[Justin A]

[ QUOTE ]
sometimes when you bunch, you get some weak pockets that tear easily or aren't as thick as they should be. Also, the surface area is akwardly shaped. Folding gives you a nice rectangle.

[/ QUOTE ]

Those are only problems if you are stingy with the amount toilet paper you use when you bunch.

Justin A

[ThaSaltCracka]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
sometimes when you bunch, you get some weak pockets that tear easily or aren't as thick as they should be. Also, the surface area is akwardly shaped. Folding gives you a nice rectangle.

[/ QUOTE ]

Those are only problems if you are stingy with the amount toilet paper you use when you bunch.

Justin A

[/ QUOTE ]If you use to much, clogging may happen. Clearly bunching has a number of risks that folding just doesn't have.

[Justin A]

[ QUOTE ]
If you use to much, clogging may happen. Clearly bunching has a number of risks that folding just doesn't have.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm assuming you're talking about clogging the toilet, in which case you bring up a good point. I think the very low frequency of extra clogging caused by extra toilet paper is not enough to make bunching a bad idea. That being said, you've definitely made me rethink my stance, and I will be testing the pros and cons of both in the next week.

There won't be any updates in case any of you sickos were wondering.

Justin A

[PhatTBoll]

[ QUOTE ]
If you use to much, clogging may happen. Clearly bunching has a number of risks that folding just doesn't have.

[/ QUOTE ]

First of all, get a toilet that isn't a weak piece of garbage.

Second of all, the bunch's benefits come into play when you are faced with a dangler. If you use the fold on a dangler, what do you get? An anal region covered with deuce. The bunch, however, has many folds and crevices, increasing the friction, or grip, that your wiping apparatus has on the dangler. This increases the likelihood that the entire dangler will be captured by the TP. And truly, in life, there is no greater accomplishment than that.

[TimM]

I bunch.

I look at the paper.

I sometimes flush before and after wipe.

I wet the paper when I'm in a bathroom with easy sink access, for maximum removal.

[Michael Davis]

I hate it when I get poop on my hand.

-Michael

[Chah Ngo]

[ QUOTE ]
Folding gives you a nice rectangle.

[/ QUOTE ]
I am certain that rectum and rectangle have the same root.