Paul Phillips, $2-5 Mirage

[parttimepro]

[ QUOTE ]
This post was the one that got me thinking.

How to beat up on inexperienced players who wait for good hands; What are some of the ways Paul's talking about?

What are trademarks of these typical "not bad, but inexperienced players" and what gear do you switch to, to leverage these traits against them?


[/ QUOTE ]
It is far, far too late to get intelligent discussion out of this thread. Start a new one with the same question.

[JohnG]

[ QUOTE ]
So if someone has some insight on an interesting subject he/she can act anyway they want?

[/ QUOTE ]

What do you suggest? That a person should act how other people want?

[JohnG]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
He produced a little "I gave Paul Phillips a bad beat" poker chip

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I can see why you disregard any comments here that point to his arrogance. Makes sense to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Looks more like humour to me.

[JohnG]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I can see why you disregard any comments here that point to his arrogance. Makes sense to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

.... What qualifies you to make a character assessment Vince?

[/ QUOTE ]

Arrogance?

[wray]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So if someone has some insight on an interesting subject he/she can act anyway they want?

[/ QUOTE ]

What do you suggest? That a person should act how other people want?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think they should act how they want. But I don't think it's acceptable for someone to act like a prick just because he knows more than others about a particular subject.


I guess what I'm saying is some people think because he knows more than others about poker that he can act any way he wants. Anyone can act anyway one wants but to defend it by saying "He has some insight about poke that others just aaren't able to give" is a terrible excuse.

I'm not using this specific deal as what I'm talking about. Just in general.