|
|
#52
10-09-2005, 12:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Evaluating quality of threads
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] No offense, but I really don't care what your opinion is of a post. [/ QUOTE ] Uh, OK. See gorie's post in this thread for an example of how to be funny rather than lame. [/ QUOTE ] Are those the only two options under the new regime? 
|
|
#53
10-09-2005, 12:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Evaluating quality of threads
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] No offense, but I really don't care what your opinion is of a post. [/ QUOTE ] Uh, OK. See gorie's post in this thread for an example of how to be funny rather than lame. [/ QUOTE ] did i say 1 star ? i meant 5.
|
|
#54
10-09-2005, 12:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Evaluating quality of threads
It seems like it would make more sense if ElD was mod rather than [censored].
|
|
#55
10-09-2005, 12:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Evaluating quality of threads
[censored] is known as 'The MOD.' He's supposed to be very good with a ban, but only in matters of business with some sort of reasonable complaint.
|
|
#58
10-09-2005, 04:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Evaluating quality of threads
This is kind of a good idea. Maybe you could start up a site like www.ratemythread.com or something. 2+2 isn't the only internet forum to explode lately. The internet just seems to be slowly creeping into a more and more normal means of social communiaction. 2+2 of course is an extreme example because of the poker boom. You could be an internet celebrity.
|
|
#59
10-10-2005, 04:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Evaluating quality of threads
|
|
#60
10-10-2005, 05:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Evaluating quality of threads
[ QUOTE ]
How do you feel about this one el d: dids dance thread [/ QUOTE ] dibs has been a decent poster over time, so I bet [censored] will give him a second chance after banning him for this crap.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
