|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set Tens, Large pot, Out of SB
[ QUOTE ]
should of [/ QUOTE ] It's should have. I don't mind a flop check raise if you're sure someone will bet for you, but I don't think it changes the outcome of the hand. And there's no way I fold the river without some sort of read. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set Tens, Large pot, Out of SB
After the flop, you don't know where this potential bet from these aggressives is going to come from -- w/o a good read on that, just bet it out. It'll have the same protection factor if an early player raises your bet as when you pop a late position bettor.
You've got a good hand, but it's vulnerable. So be it. Follow through with PF and bet out on your equity and see what follows. Now, if the button is hyper-aggressive, and the other fellows are kinda passive.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set Tens, Large pot, Out of SB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] should of [/ QUOTE ] It's should have. [/ QUOTE ] It's "It's "should have."" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set Tens, Large pot, Out of SB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] should of [/ QUOTE ] It's should have. [/ QUOTE ] It's "It's "should have."" [/ QUOTE ] It's "It's "It's "should've.""" am i right? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set Tens, Large pot, Out of SB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] should of [/ QUOTE ] It's should have. [/ QUOTE ] It's "It's "should have."" [/ QUOTE ] Actually, those should be single quotation marks within the double quotes. I feel like I've really contributed to this thread. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set Tens, Large pot, Out of SB
i like it and play it the same way. there's definetly no reason to fold, ever, here.
|
|
|