#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Official\" Live at the Bike thread (10/6)
If Jesus's last name is Romero, he came in 21st in yesterday's Nl event.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
full time player
the other day you said that full timr players should play no less than 30-60 limit.
I know many players that play less than that. can you clarify why you feel this way/ thanks [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Official\" Live at the Bike thread (10/6)
Looking at the Bike's site, there is a mention of 1 rebuy only, so it'll get closer to the 10k guarantee.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Official\" Live at the Bike thread (10/6)
[ QUOTE ]
Why is it they allow these players to play out of racks? Intentional game slowdown in order to enable better L@TB coverage? [/ QUOTE ] This irritates the hell out of me, too. I've never heard a good reason why players should be allowed to play out of racks. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Official\" Live at the Bike thread (10/6)
black 5 - what a turn card for seat 2
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Official\" Live at the Bike thread (10/6)
you cannot play out of racks in san jose ca as well
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Official\" Live at the Bike thread (10/6)
If you play some of the area Tribal cardrooms, they require the chips to be out of the rack. They say it "kills the jackpot"
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Official\" Live at the Bike thread (10/6)
DID ANYONE ELSE HATE THAT DARK CHECK?
If seat 3 led out anyone think he would've taken it down? |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Official\" Live at the Bike thread (10/6)
Russ you big ass pussy! you should have pushed all in!
BDub1 |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Official\" Live at the Bike thread (10/6)
What could he put him on with the limp large reraise from EP?
If he calls with JJ before the flop, he either puts him on AA or KK in which he is beat, or he's up against an underpair or AK suited; can he really put him on AQ making that play preflop? Calling the pot with JJ on the flop just to fold it on the turn with no scare card? |
|
|