#1
|
|||
|
|||
Shortanded, versus a near-LAG and K high, yee haw!
Got about 140 full-ring stats on the dude, he's aaaaalmost a LAG, 55% VPIP and 20%PFR, but his AF is a bit below the threshhold. He's not above a checkraise if he has a hand.
PokerStars 0.50/1.00 Hold'em (4 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is Button with K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, SB calls, BB calls. Flop: (6 SB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> SB checks, BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, SB folds, BB calls. Turn: (4 BB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> BB checks, Hero checks. River: (4 BB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, Hero... Final Pot: 5 BB First off, anyone fire on the turn again? I was thinking about it, but couldn't think of a good reason, and his pauses when taking action felt like he was trying to slowplay something. He's got every reason to bet on the river when I show weakness, but I wouldn't put a bluff past him; think I might be good 1 in 5 here? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shortanded, versus a near-LAG and K high, yee haw!
I bet-fold the turn. With AK, I check and call a bet on the river if I think he can bluff.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shortanded, versus a near-LAG and K high, yee haw!
First of all, I would never fire on this flop. Secondly, getting 5:1 on the end, I think the river's an easy fold.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shortanded, versus a near-LAG and K high, yee haw!
I usually autofire on the turn in these positions (HU, ragedy board.) I've been trying to curb this habit, but I would imagine most of the time it's correct.
The way you played it, I would fold the river. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shortanded, versus a near-LAG and K high, yee haw!
[ QUOTE ]
First of all, I would never fire on this flop. [/ QUOTE ] Serious? I can't see a better missed flop from which to make a continuation bet. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shortanded, versus a near-LAG and K high, yee haw!
[ QUOTE ]
First of all, I would never fire on this flop. [/ QUOTE ] Reasons to bet the flop as a continuation: 1 - 3-handed 2 - In position 3 - Against two blinds 4 - Ragged flop (two cards under 7, one mid-range card, no overcards, no flush draw) 5 - Players will incorrectly fold six outers against king-high 6 - It's +EV |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shortanded, versus a near-LAG and K high, yee haw!
[ QUOTE ]
First of all, I would never fire on this flop. [/ QUOTE ] Really? Why? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shortanded, versus a near-LAG and K high, yee haw!
.... the flop is auto-bet.... why is that even being debated?
ok to be honest, in game, against most opponents i check through the turn and pray my free card hits, but looking at it here i think you have to bet the turn and it makes the rest of the hand much easier to play. The river alone, I fold. I call with any ace, but not KQ. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shortanded, versus a near-LAG and K high, yee haw!
You bet the turn and check the river through.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shortanded, versus a near-LAG and K high, yee haw!
the flop is an auto bet; i misread the flop as being 5 or 6 handed. excuse me.
|
|
|