Padoogi Sucks

[Gabe]

[ QUOTE ]
... much harder than Triple Draw.

[/ QUOTE ]

If a hypothetical guy was to call on the end with 76543 in 2-7 TD, and stand pat, before the first draw and bet all the way with A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]3 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]6 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]J [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] in Padoogi, would you say, for him, both games would likely be equally difficult?

[Luv2DriveTT]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
... much harder than Triple Draw.

[/ QUOTE ]

If a hypothetical guy was to call on the end with 76543 in 2-7 TD, and stand pat, before the first draw and bet all the way with A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]3 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]6 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]J [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] in Padoogi, would you say, for him, both games would likely be equally difficult?

[/ QUOTE ]

A straight is an understandable error to make for someone new to the 2-7 lowball format, than that godawful hand in Paduggi. Hypothetically speaking of course [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

But neither hand can beat Bison Bison raising all streets with a full house when he played Sfer's (pre-Daver days) stack during the last 2-7 match at the Wynn. That was the worst hand I've ever seen played down at that game, nothing can compare.

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

[andyfox]

I'm still waiting to find out the hypothetical chances of that same hypothetical guy losing with a 5-4-2-1 padoogie.

Hypothetically speaking.

Some guys are just dense. When I play blackjack, I have to take my pants off to count to 21.