#1
|
|||
|
|||
Controversy in PStars Dealmaking *Input Please*
The following conversation happened during heads up play in a $160 double shootout on Stars.
wilspeed: u wanna do a deal Thrasymachus: i'm up for a winner play loser 1k Thrasymachus: if you want Thrasymachus: play = pay wilspeed: ok Thrasymachus: that cool? Wilspeed did not respond, and thus Thras assumed there was no deal. There was no more chat until the end of the tournament. Do you view this chat as grounds for the deal to be enforced by Stars support? I will make a post with what eventually happened soon. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Controversy in PStars Dealmaking *Input Please*
No
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Controversy in PStars Dealmaking *Input Please*
absolutely no deal. There has to be a pokerstars staff member confirm the deal with all involved.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Controversy in PStars Dealmaking *Input Please*
[ QUOTE ]
The following conversation happened during heads up play in a $160 double shootout on Stars. wilspeed: u wanna do a deal Thrasymachus: i'm up for a winner play loser 1k Thrasymachus: if you want Thrasymachus: play = pay wilspeed: ok Thrasymachus: that cool? Wilspeed did not respond, and thus Thras assumed there was no deal. There was no more chat until the end of the tournament. Do you view this chat as grounds for the deal to be enforced by Stars support? I will make a post with what eventually happened soon. [/ QUOTE ] I'm no expert on deals, but It seems to me that wilspeed agreed when he said "ok". I don't think you have to keep saying yes every time your opponent asks. What if the conversation went like this: wilspeed: u wanna do a deal Thrasymachus: i'm up for a winner play loser 1k Thrasymachus: if you want Thrasymachus: play = pay wilspeed: ok Thrasymachus: that cool? wilspeed: yes Thrasymachus: so it's a deal? wilspeed: yea Thrasymachus: you down with that? wilspeed: uh, yea Thrasymachus: fo sheezy? wilspeed: look, i don't even know what you're talking about anymore is that a deal? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Controversy in PStars Dealmaking *Input Please*
[ QUOTE ]
absolutely no deal. There has to be a pokerstars staff member confirm the deal with all involved. [/ QUOTE ] Lol. You must have missed the thread. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Controversy in PStars Dealmaking *Input Please*
Sounds like first person asked for a deal, the other guy said the winner should give the loser $1,000, and the first guy agreed.
This looks like a deal and there shouldn't be any controversy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Controversy in PStars Dealmaking *Input Please*
Based on a previous thread, I would say they enforced the deal.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Controversy in PStars Dealmaking *Input Please*
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Controversy in PStars Dealmaking *Input Please*
[ QUOTE ]
The following conversation happened during heads up play in a $160 double shootout on Stars. wilspeed: u wanna do a deal Thrasymachus: i'm up for a winner play loser 1k Thrasymachus: if you want Thrasymachus: play = pay wilspeed: ok Thrasymachus: that cool? Wilspeed did not respond, and thus Thras assumed there was no deal. There was no more chat until the end of the tournament. Do you view this chat as grounds for the deal to be enforced by Stars support? I will make a post with what eventually happened soon. [/ QUOTE ] I missed this, what channel was it on? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Controversy in PStars Dealmaking *Input Please*
[ QUOTE ]
Sounds like first person asked for a deal, the other guy said the winner should give the loser $1,000, and the first guy agreed. This looks like a deal and there shouldn't be any controversy [/ QUOTE ] Coorect me if I am wrong. Offer: Deal? Counter Offer: 1K heads up tourn. <I'll stop here> If the winner drops his $500 on purpose, isn't that chip dumping? grounds for your account being closed? |
|
|