|
|
|
|
#1
10-25-2005, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JJ vs. LRR, does he have it?
[ QUOTE ]
Regardless, on this ace-less and king-less flop, you must call down [/ QUOTE ] I think you need to call down anyway. People do this with all kinds of hands. The only way I play this differently is if an ace flops, forget the king. If an ace flops, I c/c the flop rather than leading since a lot of the hands people like to get funky and LRR with are big aces or little suited aces. Looks good though. 
|
|
#2
10-25-2005, 07:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: JJ vs. LRR, does he have it?
[ QUOTE ]
I think you need to call down anyway. [/ QUOTE ] Against a clear TAG (28/20/2.5/50+) on whom I had a note that said "LRR AA/KK/AK" or something, where I did not expect him to be on tilt, I would would bet the flop HU and fold to a raise, or raise the flop and fold to a 3-bet. That said, my qualifications suggest this situation will arise very seldom, so I agree, generally, that he needs to call this down HU unless the board becomes atrocious (e.g., AK5 flop, 4th street fills an obvious draw, etc). In a MW field, I fold JJ if there are 1-2 overcards and an overcall from a player other than the LRRer.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
