#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another interesting table read - perhaps ($22)
[ QUOTE ]
After the hand, I really had a sense for how to think about playing in situations like these with deeper stacks. It was the first time I've had that kind of epiphany. [/ QUOTE ] sounds like it's time to move to cash games chuck |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another interesting table read - perhaps ($22)
I promise an afterlife with 72 virgins to the first person who posts a hand played in a similar way by villian preflp and on the flop where the villian had bupkis.
The second poster will get 71 virgins, and so on. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another interesting table read - perhaps ($22)
You might be overthinking for this buy-in level. At $22 everybody's not aware of cbetting, and somebody might be just too weaktight to bet this when scared of K. At higher levels that check would be more suspicious.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another interesting table read - perhaps ($22)
3-things immediately pop into my head as I read this thread:
1) No need for non-standard play here. Raise it up PF. With a raise and a reraise, I may even push here in a 22 (50% of the time, let's say). At the very least you must raise though. It's not just a non-standard line, it's bad. 2) You're not really that deep stacked here. 3) Just play ABC poker. He will have 45 other random hands (ok maybe not 45, but you know what I mean) for every time he has a set of kings. If I can't get it all in preflop, I am sure as hell trying to get it all in on the flop. The only reason to check behind on this flop is to induce a bluff on the turn. I think this is a dangerous results-oriented post that could lead some players in the wrong direction. Overpairs are very profitable in the 22s. Scary check on rag board or not, you're gonna lost a lot more with AA in the long run than you win if you play it like this. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another interesting table read - perhaps ($22)
[ QUOTE ]
You might be overthinking for this buy-in level. At $22 everybody's not aware of cbetting, and somebody might be just too weaktight to bet this when scared of K. At higher levels that check would be more suspicious. [/ QUOTE ] I agree, he could hold QQ, JJ, AQ, anything here "afraid" of the K on the flop, maybe players are too weak to even c-bet. I defiantely re-raise PF, I very much doubt villian will fold here to a re-raise, he'll at least call your raise and helps build the pot. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another interesting table read - perhaps ($22)
u guys are weird.... Today i had AA at lvl 2 in a $55 in MP... UTG limps, i raise to 125, CO calls, BB pushes w/ 400 chips, UTG pushes w/ 995, i push w/ 1,000, CO call 985... Hands
BB KQ UTG 33 ME AA button AK of course 33 wins, but doing anything but pushing in YOUR spot is foolish. I know people are saying, "be more open minded, and try and win more chips," but FPS is something that is creeping back into this forum. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another interesting table read - perhaps ($22)
First of I reraise pre flop, I mean common its a 22.
Now on the flop I think you are way over thinking here, but if you want to go with your line here you have to check call any bet. You will diffinatly see enough random hands bluffing here if you check call. Let me repeat that you cannot fold especially if you check the flop. |
|
|