Mahatma vs. X: A one million dollar pot. Should these stay or go?

[Mackerel]

I, for one, find many of them interesting to read on occasion, since I don't have the time or energy to railbird these games much. And they're easy enough to ignore if I'm looking for more substance. Just my $0.02

[FakeKramer]

I'm disappointed to see that a moderator of these forums made such a biasedly-worded poll.

[IHateCats]

While I don't generally read most of them, largely because they don't have the recent history of what's been happening in the game which is crucial heads up or all the necessary detail to make a reasonable analysis, it's a valid way for new posters and new players to get introduced to the strategy of the game and get their feet wet and frankly it's better than having them listening to Norman Chad's advice.

In short it's a price we should be willing to pay to get noobs involved in the game and interested in high stakes cash games instead of just tourneys.

[Roman]

[ QUOTE ]
I voted no. I think they should be posted on internet, news views, etc. only allow if it's a strategy post

[/ QUOTE ]

[CourtesyFlush]

I'm voting "Yes", mainly because that AK top two hand sparked some great discussion here. Also because I am lame and enjoy hearing about great HU or SH matchups that are happening.

[-Skeme-]

Maybe just one sticky thread for noteable high stakes players against other noteable high stakes and/or name pro players? It can be cleared and reset each week?

[Pete]

if the posts keep on coming then its obvious people are interested in it.....let people keep on posting

[Niwa]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I voted no. I think they should be posted on internet, news views, etc. only allow if it's a strategy post

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[citanul]

[ QUOTE ]
Maybe just one sticky thread for noteable high stakes players against other noteable high stakes and/or name pro players? It can be cleared and reset each week?

[/ QUOTE ]

unlocked sticky threads aren't an option.

citanul