Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > The Stock Market
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 11-28-2005, 11:20 PM
Evan Evan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sthief09: im kinda drunk from the nyquil
Posts: 1,562
Default Re: Cost of equity

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Okay, in general it may be true, but not often enough to make the blanket statement that indices are less risky than stocks.

The beta of a market is 1, it is not true that no stock's beta is <1.

[/ QUOTE ]

In the way that you used it, Beta represents correlation to the market.

Thus, while it can be used to measure the level of market risk; it can not be used to measure individual stock risk.

I suggest you spend some time on riskgrades

[/ QUOTE ]
I know beta is not a measure of an individual stock's risk. I didn't mean to imply that. It was a seperate but somewhat related statement, just in case people reading this thread weren't aware that betas can be <1.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.