|
|
#43
08-27-2005, 03:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question about SNGs and fluctuation
If I was heavily cashed (ie 6%+RB over 5k $215s) 4 tabling 215s is more attractive than 6-8 tabling 55s. Then again if I was hitting 6% at the $215s I could probally make as much at the $109s. So yeh, 4 table the $109s thanks.
|
|
#44
08-27-2005, 03:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question about SNGs and fluctuation
My friend 8 tables.
|
|
#45
08-27-2005, 05:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question about SNGs and fluctuation
I think he is a good player, at lease he can beat the rake, which means he is well above average. but a top-notch SNG player should be able to get a 12%+ ROI over a large sample. yeah, i think 5000 SNG is a large enough sample to calculate you ROI. but maybe your friend is still improving his game. i think on PP 215, 15%-16% ROI is about the max ROI you can maintain in a long run especially if you are multi-tabling.
|
|
#46
08-27-2005, 05:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question about SNGs and fluctuation
[ QUOTE ]
i think on PP 215, 15%-16% ROI is about the max ROI you can maintain in a long run especially if you are multi-tabling. [/ QUOTE ] So states the mysterious stranger. HIS WORD IS DOCTRINE AND LAW!!!!!!!
|
|
#47
08-27-2005, 05:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question about SNGs and fluctuation
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 6% ROI over 5,000 tournaments at 200+15's is very good. [/ QUOTE ] response 1 for this thread: no, it's not. it's making an ok amount of money, it's not even close to "very good" citanul [/ QUOTE ] But I read in the FAQ that 6% was the highest a good player could sustain over a long period of time in the 200+15s.
|
|
#48
08-27-2005, 05:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question about SNGs and fluctuation
thanks. hehe
cetainly higher ROI is achievable if you play single table ,choose your game very carefully and only play in peak hours. but you wont make a lot of money playing that way.
|
|
#49
08-27-2005, 11:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question about SNGs and fluctuation
[ QUOTE ]
what favorable rules? Have their been casinos that offer 3:1 on blackjacks? any special rules I have seen (like spanish 21 or blackjack\3 card poker combo) are just extra sucker bets. Im not arguing with you that just sparked my curiousity. [/ QUOTE ] - splitting pairs - dealer standing on soft 17s - double down after splitting pairs - splitting aces - multiple cards when splitting pairs - early surrender - late surrender (NEVER offered anymore, very favorable to player)
|
|
#50
08-28-2005, 06:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question about SNGs and fluctuation
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] what favorable rules? Have their been casinos that offer 3:1 on blackjacks? any special rules I have seen (like spanish 21 or blackjack\3 card poker combo) are just extra sucker bets. Im not arguing with you that just sparked my curiousity. [/ QUOTE ] - splitting pairs - dealer standing on soft 17s - double down after splitting pairs - splitting aces - multiple cards when splitting pairs - early surrender - late surrender (NEVER offered anymore, very favorable to player) [/ QUOTE ] oh, ok. I thought those were all standard except for the surrenders (never seen either at a casino) and the soft 17\hard 17 rule (ive seen both about equally)
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
