Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old 10-28-2005, 03:44 PM
jaxmike jaxmike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 636
Default Re: Libby indicted - five counts

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Indictment available here.

Prediction: plea or pardon (or both). No way this goes to trial, since the WH will not be able to avoid having Cheney testify.

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

What are you talking about. Cheney is basically 100% cleared of any wrong doing with this indictment. The dude even said that Libby started the disemination of infomation about Plame. Even if Cheney told him, there is NOTHING wrong with it.

[/ QUOTE ]

What are you talking about?

He is talking about Cheney being a probable witness.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not at all what was insinuated. What was insinuated was that the WH didn't want Cheney to testify because he had something to hide. Why else would the WH not want Cheney to testify?
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.