#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Still waiting for my Party October bonus offer
I'm wondering why it's taking me so darn long to clear my Party bonus... so I check the terms and conditions:
"A player in a real money game is considered to have played a raked hand if he or she has contributed 1 cent or more in rake in that hand." Was this always the case? You actually have to PLAY the hand or be in the blinds??? ugh |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Still waiting for my Party October bonus offer
[ QUOTE ]
I'm wondering why it's taking me so darn long to clear my Party bonus... so I check the terms and conditions: "A player in a real money game is considered to have played a raked hand if he or she has contributed 1 cent or more in rake in that hand." Was this always the case? You actually have to PLAY the hand or be in the blinds??? ugh [/ QUOTE ] from the way it looks, you now have to actually contribute to the pot inroder to clear the bonus...if thats true...that BLOWS!!!! anyone play yet and can confirm/deny this? if so, I am going to play some 1/2 instead of NL |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Still waiting for my Party October bonus offer
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm wondering why it's taking me so darn long to clear my Party bonus... so I check the terms and conditions: "A player in a real money game is considered to have played a raked hand if he or she has contributed 1 cent or more in rake in that hand." Was this always the case? You actually have to PLAY the hand or be in the blinds??? ugh [/ QUOTE ] from the way it looks, you now have to actually contribute to the pot inroder to clear the bonus...if thats true...that BLOWS!!!! anyone play yet and can confirm/deny this? if so, I am going to play some 1/2 instead of NL [/ QUOTE ] No. You don't. Nothing has changed. *edit* Don't believe me? Read this: Mike O'malley explains that Party has not changed the rake structure |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Still waiting for my Party October bonus offer
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm wondering why it's taking me so darn long to clear my Party bonus... so I check the terms and conditions: "A player in a real money game is considered to have played a raked hand if he or she has contributed 1 cent or more in rake in that hand." Was this always the case? You actually have to PLAY the hand or be in the blinds??? ugh [/ QUOTE ] from the way it looks, you now have to actually contribute to the pot inroder to clear the bonus...if thats true...that BLOWS!!!! anyone play yet and can confirm/deny this? if so, I am going to play some 1/2 instead of NL [/ QUOTE ] No. You don't. Nothing has changed. *edit* Don't believe me? Read this: Mike O'malley explains that Party has not changed the rake structure [/ QUOTE ] thank you |
|
|