Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19  
Old 12-14-2005, 08:16 PM
poincaraux poincaraux is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 0
Default Re: common lines flowchart

There are a lot of categories .. even general ones. Would this be a reasonable way to organize things?

<ul type="square">[*]Only look at NL25 and NL50 6-max, as that seems to be what most people play here.[*]Break hands up into the ones fimbulwinter uses in his preflop stragety post. Those categories should be good for pre-flop considerations. So, all threads talking about how to play AA,KK pre-flop go in the same category.[*]Each article gets the post/thread title and people can assign keywords and/or descriptions.[*]Flop, Turn and River get broken up into categories like overpair, TPTK, set, OESFD, etc. Again, keywords/descriptions can be added, so "short stack set on flop" can be distinguished from "deep stack set on flop"[/list]
This won't give you a complete flowchart of what to do, but it'll be pretty good. If you're asking "hero raises from MP with QQ pre-flop then bets pot heads-up into an unknown LP caller on a ten high double suited flop. What's a good line for the turn and river if called?" then you can paw through the flop-&gt;overpairs articles and see if there's something relevant. I suppose you could split it up by preflop hands at each level, so that you'd be looking at BigPocketPairs-&gt;Flop-&gt;Overpair, but that seems like too many things would hit too many categories post-flop.

It seems like a fair number of 2+2 folks use firefox. If we set up a wiki, it should be pretty easy to write a firefox extension to help out with this. If you're reading a good thread, you go through 2+2Wiki menus and click on Flop-&gt;Overpair and it pops up a little window asking you for keywords and a description of why the thread was interesting. Then, it adds the thread to the wiki page. For extra grooviness, the wiki page should order threads based on the number of people who suggested it. It should also aggregate keywords and descriptions.

That actually sounds pretty cool to me. If people want to help me hash out the details (how things should be categorized, etc.), I might want to write it up in my spare time.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.