#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Etiquitte of Peeking?
[ QUOTE ]
My response has been: 1) Tell them I can see their cards. 2) If it continues, tell them if they keep showing you their cards that you are going to start looking at them. 3) Start looking at their cards. [/ QUOTE ] I just do (1), because if they don't fear you doing (3) then (2) is not going to help. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Etiquitte of Peeking?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] My response has been: 1) Tell them I can see their cards. 2) If it continues, tell them if they keep showing you their cards that you are going to start looking at them. 3) Start looking at their cards. [/ QUOTE ] I just do (1), because if they don't fear you doing (3) then (2) is not going to help. [/ QUOTE ] 2 is basically just more 1. I feel more comfortable giving them two shots. I wouldn't think twice about someone who only gave them one warning. I would be a little bothered by someone who didn't give any warning. (Although it isn't remotely cheating.) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Etiquitte of Peeking?
1. Perfectly fine, keep looking. Or make prop bets that can tell exactly what he is holding. Did this at mirage for a few bucks once.
2. Perfectly fine, keep looking. Or make prop bets that can tell exactly what he is holding. Did this at mirage for a few bucks once. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Etiquitte of Peeking?
Prop bets, could you define??
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Etiquitte of Peeking?
[ QUOTE ]
Prop bets, could you define?? [/ QUOTE ] Proposition bet. Like, "I'll give you $5 if the river is a spade - you give me $2 if it isn't, deal"? Or in this case, "I'll bet you $20 I can guess your hand". |
|
|