#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BattleField Poker--Almost a Winner
[ QUOTE ]
How do you get rid of that chat box anyways? [/ QUOTE ] Also, once you get rid of the chat box on the right the tables are still slightly too big. On my 21" monitor there is still about a 1/2" of overlap on the bottom of the screen playing four tables. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BattleField Poker--Almost a Winner
I think it is a matter of what you're used to. When I started online poker I played mainly on Prima sites and still think that their miniview is the best way to multitable. I switched to Party just recently and find it very hard to play more than 4 tables. The software just isn't that handy and flexible. Party beta's miniview ain't that good since the cards and other important info is soooooo small compared to Prima even though the tables are about the same size.
Prima 8-tabling: easy Party 4-tabling: still kinda hard I'm sure I'll get better with practise. But still, I feel Prima software doesn't deserve the mocking it gets. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BattleField Poker--Almost a Winner
[ QUOTE ]
Stars and UB are much better [/ QUOTE ] UB is nice except for one terrible problem. If the focus is on a non-UB window you will not get any alerts when it is your turn to play. If you are playing UB and another site at the same time you can be timed out and never realize it was your turn. Ditto if you are using PokerTracker or some other application. If you have nothing but UB tables up you'll never see this problem. It's hard to find enough good games on UB to play only there. They really need to make their software work well alongside other rooms. If anyone knows a workaround I'd love to hear it. |
|
|