|
|
#11
06-27-2005, 11:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 200NL tables playing like 25NL tables these days...
i believe it's a phrase from the STT forum (which I don't read) and I like it. And it is SO true. I can't [censored] stand it when people say stuff that is COMPLETELY anti-[censored]-thetical to all correct poker theory.
|
|
#13
06-28-2005, 05:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party 200NL tables playing like 25NL tables these days...
better players adjust accordingly to varying game conditions, that is why they are "good". the predictable players are just as awful as the gamblers that continuously stick it in the middle with the worst of it. when your opponent maintains a static range of hands to match their betting patterns, it becomes easy for those alert enough to take advantage of the gaps in his game.
|
|
#14
06-28-2005, 06:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party 200NL tables playing like 25NL tables these days...
Honestly though, when I'm not hitting cards, I'd much rather play against a group of tight players than a bunch of super-loose calling stations. Of course, if you're running well and hitting flops, you'll profit way more against bad players.
|
|
#15
06-28-2005, 06:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party 200NL tables playing like 25NL tables these days...
[ QUOTE ]
I like Full Tilt Poker a lot better because the fish factor is a lot smaller. I haven't heard anyone say "but they were sooted" yet. [/ QUOTE ] ummmmm.....I like fish.
|
|
#16
06-28-2005, 10:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party 200NL tables playing like 25NL tables these days...
[ QUOTE ]
i believe it's a phrase from the STT forum [/ QUOTE ] It's goes back a lot further than that. It was in use on USENET in the 90's.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
