Mason e-mail

JGalt · #1 04-17-2005, 09:33 PM

Discuss

[censored] · #2 04-17-2005, 09:38 PM

Site operator = scumbag.

enough said.

The Dude · #3 04-17-2005, 10:26 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Site operator = scumbag.

[/ QUOTE ]
I hope you're referring to the other site's operator, and not Mason. I assume you are.

[censored] · #4 04-17-2005, 10:28 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Site operator = scumbag.

[/ QUOTE ]
I hope you're referring to the other site's operator, and not Mason. I assume you are.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes. He was asked nicely to take it down and hasn't. Legal or not it seems like a scumbag thing to do.

disjunction · #5 04-17-2005, 10:32 PM

He was implicitly threatened.

When on the receiving end of a threat demanding an action A, people tend to want to do the opposite of A, especially when they perceive the threat to be a bluff. The desired effect is to reduce the bluffing frequency of one's opponents (while this may not be a good idea in Hold'em, it is often a good idea in life).

NLSoldier · #6 04-17-2005, 09:40 PM

All I know is that the 2nd chart ranks KTs waaaay too high.

spamuell · #7 04-17-2005, 09:49 PM

[ QUOTE ]
All I know is that the 2nd chart ranks KTs waaaay too high.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hate talking about poker here and I know you might not believe me because of the original HEPFAP charts, but KTs is actually a better hand than JTs.

EDIT: Btw, these second charts clearly put hands they put in different groups in random/swapped places, regardless of what the site says.

scotty34 · #8 04-17-2005, 09:46 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Modified Hold'em Hand Groupings:

Group 1: AA KKQQ JJ AKs
Group 2: TT AQs AJs KQs AK
Group 3: 99 KTs QJs KJs ATs AQ
Group 4: A8s KQ 88 QTs A9s AT AJ JTs
Group 5: 77 Q9s KJ QJ JT A7s A6s A5s A4s A3s A2s J9s T9s K9s KT QT
Group 6: 66 J8s 98s T8s 55 J9 43s 75s T9 33 98 64s 22 K8s K7s K6s K5s K4s K3s K2s Q8s 44 87s 97s
Group 7: 87 53s A9 Q9 76s 42s 32s 96s 85s J8 J7s 65 54 74s K9 T8 76 65s 54s 86s

[/ QUOTE ]

53s is stronger than 86s and 54s?
54o is stronger than 54s?
No wonder I'm such a bad poker player

InchoateHand · #9 04-17-2005, 09:47 PM

[ QUOTE ]
53s is stronger than 86s and 54s?
54o is stronger than 54s?
No wonder I'm such a bad poker player

[/ QUOTE ]

ni han

wacki · #10 04-17-2005, 09:59 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
53s is stronger than 86s and 54s?
54o is stronger than 54s?
No wonder I'm such a bad poker player

[/ QUOTE ]

ni han

[/ QUOTE ]

Group, look it up in the dictionary.