|
|
|
|
#2
12-04-2005, 01:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
|
|
#3
12-04-2005, 01:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
[ QUOTE ]
im not sure, but isn't NL($400) 2/4 blinds [/ QUOTE ] no NL$4 is $2/$4 blinds. This is NL $400 w/$200-$400 blinds. The table is up right now Tunaeatr is sitting w/ $40K alone--is that strassa or michael gracz sitting there now? He lost 5 buy-ins at $400, 31 at $200 and almost 7 at the $100. It makes sense except for the $200 losing 31 buy-ins in 8121 hands or maybe 40 hours 2-3 handed is fugging insane-he either went on tilt hugely or this data isnt valid. The way I saw him playing tues-fri nite thu it makes some sense.
|
|
#4
12-04-2005, 01:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
31 buyins in 8k hands, that is suicidal?
|
|
#5
12-04-2005, 02:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
[ QUOTE ]
Tunaeatr is sitting w/ $40K alone--is that strassa or michael gracz sitting there now? [/ QUOTE ] Most likely its neither.
|
|
#6
12-04-2005, 02:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
[ QUOTE ]
this data isnt valid. [/ QUOTE ] Its pretty easy to datamine on Prima cause the tables don't close on you.
|
|
#7
12-04-2005, 04:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
isn't $400nl a $400 buyin?
edit: just read the rest of the post. [ QUOTE ]  [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#8
12-04-2005, 02:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
[ QUOTE ]
So i'm sitting on UB looking for good games, and there I see Mahatmas sitting in my 5/10 and 10/25 games. WTF. [/ QUOTE ] FWIW, I saw him kick the [censored] out of the Takeover last night.
|
|
#9
12-04-2005, 04:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I\'ve done some mining as well and..
All I can say is I have a larger chunk of hands over a larger period of time and our numbers are more then a half a million off.
Mining these games is tricky. There is a lot of variance and you can get some real funky results over the short term especially on prima where he goes from 20k to 120k and then dumps it all but has only lost 20k. (which happens just about as much as him actually dumping that much) It's tough to ensure high quality. Even with serious control in the process, you'd still have difficultly not joining some of these in progress and skewing your data further. If you get enough hands then this becomes less of a problem.. So in essence just like a poster that posts his Pokertracker with 10k hands, GET MORE IF YOU WANT TO TALK!
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
