Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2005, 02:27 PM
Garland Garland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 351
Default T9s line...

Nothing too special about this opponent.

Comments appreciated.

Garland

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (10 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

UTG+2 ($186.95)
MP1 ($1061)
MP2 ($858)
MP3 ($352.12)
CO ($680.50)
Garland ($1228)
SB ($2398.55)
BB ($1078.75)
UTG ($526.50)
UTG+1 ($2201)

Preflop: Garland is Button with T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $5.
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, MP1 calls $10, MP2 calls $10, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Garland calls $10, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, BB checks.

Flop: ($45) 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP1 bets $25</font>, MP2 folds, <font color="#CC3333">Garland raises to $65</font>, BB folds, MP1 calls $40.

Turn: ($175) Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">MP1 bets $100</font>, Garland folds.

Final Pot: $275
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2005, 02:29 PM
Yeti Yeti is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: T9s line...

Huh?

Sometimes I would call the flop. The vast majority of the time I would raise a lot more than you did.

WTF are you doing on the turn?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2005, 02:32 PM
fsuplayer fsuplayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 187
Default Re: T9s line...

this hand baffles me, even more so than Prahlad's email to Kane.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2005, 02:45 PM
Garland Garland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 351
Default Re: T9s line...

Given the line as is, what range of hands do you put the villian on?

Garland
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:01 PM
ahnuld ahnuld is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 185
Default Re: T9s line...

lol
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:03 PM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: T9s line...

[ QUOTE ]
Given the line as is, what range of hands do you put the villian on?

[/ QUOTE ]
pretty obvious he can only have the JdTd here.
NLD.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:39 PM
Ulysses Ulysses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,519
Default Re: T9s line...

This is one of those reverse posts to show how bad your opponent played, right?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:45 PM
Publos Nemesis Publos Nemesis is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 0
Default Re: T9s line...

[ QUOTE ]
This is one of those reverse posts to show how bad your opponent played, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sweet. Garland knew his op turned the nuts! Or am I reading this wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-12-2005, 08:28 PM
thabadguy thabadguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Make Way for the Bad Guy...
Posts: 771
Default Re: T9s line...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Given the line as is, what range of hands do you put the villian on?

[/ QUOTE ]
pretty obvious he can only have the JdTd here.
NLD.

[/ QUOTE ]
vnh.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-13-2005, 02:36 PM
Garland Garland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 351
Default Thoughts...

I made a couple mistakes on this hand, and I'm glad for the criticism.

(1) I should have raised more on the flop, probably to $85 or something.

(2) Admittedly, I was so engrossed by his turn lead that I was too busy putting my opponent on a hand and overlooked my new outs, namely the straight Js.

My thoughts when the Q turned was he had the following hands in order from most probable to least:

JT for the nut straight, Q9, a set, two pair.

Opponents here don't call a flop raise and lead the turn without a solid hand. So now my thoughts were, I didn't want to catch my 9 or T and spew more money on the river. On the flip side, I was certain a diamond was good and now see the J outs that I overlooked while playing. I had good implied odds with a diamond that didn't pair the board.

The price was fair as he bet a little more than half the pot. I was wrong, and I should have called. However, if he bet the full pot, I would probably have to fold. Sound right?

Garland
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.