Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-29-2005, 09:35 PM
Adam22 Adam22 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: \"u are a rock at this limit\"

granny: same hand but 5 cold callers. i'd call then , definetly not with 3. maybe 4.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-29-2005, 10:14 PM
housenuts housenuts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 357
Default Re: \"u are a rock at this limit\"

what if it was the same hand, but no raise, and instead 3 limpers in front of him?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-29-2005, 10:36 PM
Rudbaeck Rudbaeck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 555
Default Re: \"u are a rock at this limit\"

[ QUOTE ]
what if it was the same hand, but no raise, and instead 3 limpers in front of him?

[/ QUOTE ]

Then lots of small stakers would want to raise, which is correct with JTs in the same situation, but likely not A4s.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-29-2005, 11:20 PM
Adam22 Adam22 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: \"u are a rock at this limit\"

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what if it was the same hand, but no raise, and instead 3 limpers in front of him?

[/ QUOTE ]

Then lots of small stakers would want to raise, which is correct with JTs in the same situation, but likely not A4s.

[/ QUOTE ]

isn't that raise of like, really really marginal value anyway? either way the A4s is a definite call after 3 limpers.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.