Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-18-2005, 01:25 AM
JrJordan JrJordan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 66
Default OOP with QQ - We like?

Table in general was pretty passive and only slightly loose. UTG will be a bit more aggro postflop when senses weakness but is still generally passive. CO is actaully another TAG at the table, no read on button.

Party Poker 10/20 Hold'em (6 max, 6 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is SB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
UTG calls, MP calls, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, Button calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG calls, MP folds, CO calls, Button calls.

Flop: (14 SB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG calls, CO calls, Button calls.

Turn: (9 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets</font>, CO folds, Button folds, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, UTG calls.

River: (13 BB) 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG calls.

Final Pot: 15 BB

Instead of blindly betting out on this turn and calling down if raised, I decide to check and reevaluate when it's back to me. A bet and raise means I'm toast to trips or the flush. If it's one bet to me, I'd likely go for a c/r and be willing to fold to a 3bet if it's Button or UTG (vs. just CO I'd just call down since I feel it's possible for him to 3bet this turn with a loser). River seems like a standard Clarkmeister and I'd be willing to fold to a raise.

So who likes the variation?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-18-2005, 01:18 PM
dave44 dave44 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: OOP with QQ - We like?

I like what you're trying to do and I think it makes sense if you knew the turn would get bet. However, you say the table is generally passive so it looks like this may get checked around sometimes which would be really bad for your vulnerable hand. I can't really quantify the loss of it getting checked around versus the benefit of your play, but I'd guess its pretty close.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-18-2005, 04:37 PM
whodaman whodaman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 23
Default Re: OOP with QQ - We like?

yea.. i agree with Dave
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.