Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-24-2005, 08:09 PM
kongo_totte kongo_totte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tullinge, sweden
Posts: 491
Default QQ against small stack agression.

Prima 50 NL .25/.50.

UTG has $31, MP2 has $5:50. I'm MP3 w/ queens and cover both. I more or less got stuck in this hand. Also, my 3-raise was a mis-click, I meant to make it $12 instead of $16. All comments appreciated.

UTG min. raises to $1, 3 callers, I make it $4, CO calls, UTG calls, 2 folds, MP2 goes all in for another $1:50, I make it $16, CO folds, UTG 5-raises all in for another $15, I......?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-24-2005, 08:19 PM
cookperson cookperson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 61
Default Re: QQ against small stack agression.

I'm no expert but I would think that he is obviously slow playing a high pair. How has he played before that hand, is he tight or aggressive. I would put him at kings or aces, or what would be the point of his bet?You raisng $15 must tell him that you are very strong, so why would he go all-in unless he had you? Also I question why you would jump from betting $3 to $15. Isn't that a bit of a over-bet
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-24-2005, 08:43 PM
kongo_totte kongo_totte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tullinge, sweden
Posts: 491
Default Re: QQ against small stack agression.

As I said, the $16 was a miscklick. And I agree that villian looks like AA/KK, but the pot was already $58 and it was $15 to call. How big does villians stack has to be before considering folding.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-24-2005, 08:51 PM
jbrock jbrock is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10
Default Re: QQ against small stack agression.

This is a call without hesitation for me. If UTG had KK or AA, I would have expected the reraise when your raise got to him. Instead he just called your raise to 4.

Even if you are definitely up against KK/AA, your EV is just slightly negative given the large pot. There is enough doubt in my mind (AKs and JJ, TT are possible holdings in my mind) that i would call.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-24-2005, 09:07 PM
TheWorstPlayer TheWorstPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boring work = post too much
Posts: 2,435
Default Re: QQ against small stack agression.

[ QUOTE ]
This is a call without hesitation for me. If UTG had KK or AA, I would have expected the reraise when your raise got to him. Instead he just called your raise to 4.

[/ QUOTE ]
People LOVE to slowplay AA/KK preflop. This is still an easy call, though.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-24-2005, 10:39 PM
cookperson cookperson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 61
Default Re: QQ against small stack agression.

Kongo you are right. Though he probalby beats you ,at 4-1 pot odds you have to call. What did he have?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-24-2005, 11:54 PM
gsyme gsyme is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 27
Default Re: QQ against small stack agression.

One thing you see a lot at low limits is people who think, "if i'm gonna call such a big raise, i might as well go all-in", playing the situation as though they would a tournament. I would only be mildly suprised if villian had something like AQs.

And at 4-1 odds, you gotta call.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-25-2005, 12:06 AM
xorbie xorbie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,828
Default Re: QQ against small stack agression.

[ QUOTE ]
One thing you see a lot at low limits is people who think, "if i'm gonna call such a big raise, i might as well go all-in", playing the situation as though they would a tournament. I would only be mildly suprised if villian had something like AQs.

And at 4-1 odds, you gotta call.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with this, and I think that if you're going to raise 16 or even 12 you may as well go all in. I think that you should have raised it to at least $6 originally with so many callers on the minraise, so that if MP2 went all in there wouldn't be another round of betting.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-25-2005, 07:32 AM
kongo_totte kongo_totte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tullinge, sweden
Posts: 491
Default Re: QQ against small stack agression.

"and I think that if you're going to raise 16 or even 12 you may as well go all in" I did not want this. Both me and CO still in the hand are very deep-stacked, like $150 each. I'm never risking 300BB PF w/ queens.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-25-2005, 07:57 AM
K C K C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 237
Default Re: QQ against small stack agression.

This seems to be the consensus, as the normal play is to call. You've got too much invested in this pot to give it up now. He could have a smaller pair or two high cards. There's a decent chance you're in trouble here, but the pot is paying you plenty to take a shot at it here.

The only way I can see throwing this away is if you know that this player will play this line regularly with AA or KK. It depends on the game, but this can be a profitable move if you have people who tend to go wild pre-flop. Especially early in wild SNG's, before all the freaks have been weeded out [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

KC
kingcobrapoker.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.