Why did I do this?

[ddubois]

***** Hand History for Game 760712325 *****
Table Table 11569 (Real Money)
Seat 8 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 1: NBDuo ( $1045 )
Seat 2: kdub2785 ( $755 )
Seat 6: tsmithbb ( $715 )
Seat 7: justplayin55 ( $1675 )
Seat 8: TheCondor337 ( $1085 )
Seat 3: P0K3RM4N ( $2725 )
Trny:4736213 Level:3
Blinds(25/50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to P0K3RM4N [ Ac Qs ]
P0K3RM4N raises [150].
tsmithbb folds.
justplayin55 folds.
TheCondor337 folds.
NBDuo calls [125].
kdub2785 folds.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 2s, 9c, 3h ]
NBDuo bets [300].
P0K3RM4N is all-In.
NBDuo is all-In.
** Dealing Turn ** [ 5h ]
** Dealing River ** [ Ks ]
NBDuo shows [ 7h, 7c ] a pair of sevens.
P0K3RM4N shows [ Ac, Qs ] high card ace.
P0K3RM4N wins 1680 chips from side pot #1 with high card ace.
NBDuo wins 2140 chips from the main pot with a pair of sevens.

[Rekwob]

because you thought he might have AJ ?

[deacsoft]

Use the converter please.

http://www.selachian.com/tools/bison...hconverter.cgi

[ddubois]

I guess this is what a stop'n'go looks like from the recieving end. Would anyone here have done anything other than fold the flop? I assume folding is universal, but if not, what line better represents an overpair and has some fold equity? If re-raise pushing looks like an obvious bluff, does another line have more fold equity: 1) calling, then re-raising all in on the turn; or 2) re-raising to 600 on the flop? Or is my fold equity plus the pot equity of catching an overcard so remotely far from +EV, that I shouldn't even think to ask the question?