Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-25-2005, 01:07 PM
Kevmath Kevmath is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 15
Default Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failure?

For those of you who've got $105k lying around, here's a tournament for you:

http://www.pokerplayernewspaper.com/...cle.php?id=577
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-25-2005, 01:42 PM
RoyalLance RoyalLance is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 58
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failure?

I stayed at the Statosphere once (when there was no poker in there) and I thought it was nice. Even though I have yet to seen the poker room there, but I think this event has some potential to say the least. I wish I can get a sattelite to this game.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-25-2005, 01:42 PM
cwsiggy cwsiggy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 348
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failu

Sounds interesting but what a convoluted mess with regard to who owns what piece of who from this and that property and if you are at the final table you own 3% and blah blah blah. Sheesh. And why are some pros getting a freeroll with 60% going to the public and others having to buy in fully.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-25-2005, 01:47 PM
kleos kleos is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PokerStars 2/4c LHE
Posts: 71
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failu

[ QUOTE ]
And why are some pros getting a freeroll with 60% going to the public and others having to buy in fully.

[/ QUOTE ]
And why is Mike Sexton on the list for that and Barry G is just a maybe? Unless Barry wants to buy in so he can donate more, that seems wrong on a moral level.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-25-2005, 01:48 PM
shaniac shaniac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 168
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failu

[ QUOTE ]
convoluted

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-25-2005, 01:57 PM
cwsiggy cwsiggy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 348
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failu

Or perhaps these better describe the event and it's structure....

abstruse, bewildering, circuitous, complicated, confused, convoluted, crabbed, cryptic, daedal, discursive, disordered, disturbing, enigmatic, entangled, excursive, gordian, hidden, impenetrable, inscrutable, interwoven, intricate, involved, jumbled, knotted, knotty, labyrinthine, mazy, meandering, mingled, mixed, muddled, obscure, paradoxical, perplexing, puzzling, rambling, recondite, round-about, sinuous, snarled, sophisticated, tangled, tortuous, undecipherable, unfathomable, winding
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-25-2005, 02:04 PM
jjnidguy jjnidguy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 32
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failure?

If I'm going to pay a 5k entry fee to play in a 100k tourney, shana hiatt better be waiting for me in my hotel room.

seems like a retarded rate.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-25-2005, 02:26 PM
MrClutch MrClutch is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failure?

It'll probably cost $500K just to tell everyone what's going on.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-25-2005, 02:29 PM
cwsiggy cwsiggy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 348
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failu

[ QUOTE ]
It'll probably cost $500K just to tell everyone what's going on.


[/ QUOTE ]

lol - good one
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-25-2005, 02:37 PM
odellthurman odellthurman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 37
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failure?

If everyone finishing out of the money gets a $5,000 consolation prize, then what you are really talking about is a $95,000 buy-in with $5,000 in fees.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.