Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-25-2005, 02:41 PM
fyodor fyodor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 596
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failure?

Anyone who reads this entire thread along with the linked article is automatically eligable for 1.4% of the 3% of anyone who makes the final table owns of the winner providing that person with the 3% was at least 15% staked by non-poker related advertiser with an ad of at least 6 square inches that ran in 2 consecutive months. (Offer void where prohibited by law)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-25-2005, 03:09 PM
jjnidguy jjnidguy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 32
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failure?

heh, thats pretty funny,

but seriously

the five star bellagio is $25,000+500 (2% fee)
most WPT ME $9700+300 (3% fee)
your typical 1k event $1000+75 (7.5% fee)
your typical casino daily $100+20 (20% fee)

fee percentile is supposed to go down the bigger the tourney. why the hell are they charging 10 times the bellagio for a 4x bigger buy in?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-25-2005, 03:16 PM
Kevmath Kevmath is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 15
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failu

It did take 7 years to get this off the ground, it shouldn't take 7 years to explain the tournament.

The champion would only have to defend his "title" 9 times a year at most, piece of cake.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-25-2005, 04:41 PM
flatline flatline is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failu

A $5000 entry fee is insane. If anything, they should run it with no entry fee so that they can establish the tournament. They could even give players a small cut of the TV money, which would encourage all the top players to play. They should make plenty from TV deals and sponsors anyways. Regardless, I hope this works, as it could make for great TV.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-25-2005, 04:49 PM
Python49 Python49 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 401
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failu

This tourney sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-25-2005, 04:50 PM
lighterjobs lighterjobs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 908
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failure?

i doubt it's doomed for failure such as the 50k plaza tournament. look at the players they already have committed to play in the tournament.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-25-2005, 09:23 PM
sirio11 sirio11 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 11
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failu

[ QUOTE ]
Or perhaps these better describe the event and it's structure....

abstruse, bewildering, circuitous, complicated, confused, convoluted, crabbed, cryptic, daedal, discursive, disordered, disturbing, enigmatic, entangled, excursive, gordian, hidden, impenetrable, inscrutable, interwoven, intricate, involved, jumbled, knotted, knotty, labyrinthine, mazy, meandering, mingled, mixed, muddled, obscure, paradoxical, perplexing, puzzling, rambling, recondite, round-about, sinuous, snarled, sophisticated, tangled, tortuous, undecipherable, unfathomable, winding

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-26-2005, 03:38 AM
blaze666 blaze666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: norwich, england
Posts: 439
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failu

yes, i can see where you are coming from, and you made a good point, but i'd have to disagree with your logic here, i think it r0xx0rs.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-26-2005, 04:45 AM
ThaHero ThaHero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles and .25/.50 on PS
Posts: 199
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failure?

Sounds interesting, but confusing.

I feel sorry for any amatuer player that wins, although it would probably be harder for him to do so in such a small field. But just looking at their numbers...

Joe Blow wins the tourney and gets his $5M. He automatically loses part of that and only gets $3M because you only get 60%. Then he loses another 10-20% roughly to the other players that were at his final table and the site or advertisers who sent him or whatever. So he's down to maybe 1.5 or 2 mill. Then he has to pay taxes! That'll be about half, so he'll be around 750,000, which really ain't shabby. But THEN he has to "defend his title" and put up that $1M against another player. He is actually IN DEBT if my calculations were correct. If not, I know they were at least close. So this seems like it would suck for an "amatuer." I think I'd just try to get as far as possible and then try to bust out before I win.

I also forsee problems with getting 9 people to put up a million against you every month. Although with pros staking each other that might not be so bad. But who's gonna stake the amatuer? lol.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-26-2005, 08:25 AM
hotdog da 2rd hotdog da 2rd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 196
Default Re: Heavyweight Championship of Poker - great idea or doomed for failu

this tourney's bananas. their champion'll be filing for bankruptcy every month.


what's w/ the crab fists? can you imagine wearing this logo everywhere you go. LoL
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.