Josh. (formerly sthief09) has been banned...

[sfer]

While this is undoubtedly good for his grades, the rationale I've heard is silly.

[asofel]

i heard about this....for what?

[HopeydaFish]

And the rationale is....?

[AngryCola]

[ QUOTE ]
And the rationale is....?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ask Dynasty. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[imported_CaseClosed326]

I thought banning really good strategy posters was against the rules.

[citanul]

jesus, this is ridiculous.

when someone gets banned they have an issue with th moderator. if they want to discuss it they should do it through that moderator and or through mat. they shouldn't and their friends shouldn't start new threads all over the place talking about how lame it is that they got banned. particularly in the case of temporary bannings. if someone gets banned for 5 days or whatever, they should just be banned for 5 days and chill out unless they have a real legitimate reason for not doing so.

grassroots campaigns of this nature are sad. they're sadder when started by mods, but sad nonetheless when not.

c

[AngryCola]

[ZBTHorton]

As a fellow member of the Zeta Beta Tau Fraternity, I 100% agree with him, even though I have no idea what he did.

[daryn]

say what happened

[B Dids]

This would be fine is the mod was the least bit reasonable. I've been somebody that's supported Dynasty, but it's getting silly.

Banning well respected posters because of one off-hand comment is retarded.