Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-16-2005, 10:55 AM
Redd Redd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 44
Default Re: 23s ...I know, I know: Fold PF

[ QUOTE ]
I would play either in the SB without a second thought. Here it costs .5SB more...

[/ QUOTE ]

This seems like a slippery slope situation.

[ QUOTE ]
we still have 1.5 outs to trips, 2 outs to two pair, 3 outs to a straight, and 1 out to a backdoor flush.

[/ QUOTE ]

You don't think we're being too generous with the outs to bottom two that put a 4-straight on, and outs to the nut-low end of a one-card straight with an OESD on board? Both in a large field?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-16-2005, 11:11 AM
thejameser thejameser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: I\'m a FAG:Frugal Aggressive(Not that there is anything wrong with that)
Posts: 410
Default Re: 23s ...I know, I know: Fold PF

[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand why you raised the flop; this doesn't seem like a good place to push bottom pair. You've got a bunch of loose opponents, a weak-tight calling with something, very tainted outs and you need to dodge every card in the deck twice over.

[/ QUOTE ]

call it a semi bluff with a gutshot and a pair with bd flush potential if it makes you feel better. i could face most of the field with 2 and the fewer i have in the hand, the more my equity, no? i really wanted the free card, though.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-16-2005, 11:33 AM
SeaEagle SeaEagle is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: 23s ...I know, I know: Fold PF

[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand why you raised the flop; this doesn't seem like a good place to push bottom pair. You've got a bunch of loose opponents, a weak-tight calling with something, very tainted outs and you need to dodge every card in the deck twice over.

[/ QUOTE ]
If you're going to play this flop, then you need to raise and try to knock some people out. All of hero's outs are tainted and, for instance, knocking out a UI 7x (that will have odds to draw for a single bet) can buy 4 full outs in a big pot.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-16-2005, 12:47 PM
Yads Yads is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 412
Default Re: 23s ...I know, I know: Fold PF

I like it. Good raise on the flop hopefully folding out a 7 to buy some outs to your ass end straight.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-16-2005, 02:56 PM
Octopus Octopus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: working on my dissertation
Posts: 143
Default Re: 23s ...I know, I know: Fold PF

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would play either in the SB without a second thought. Here it costs .5SB more...

[/ QUOTE ]

This seems like a slippery slope situation.

[/ QUOTE ]
You left out the part about having position in a passive field. That is important.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
we still have 1.5 outs to trips, 2 outs to two pair, 3 outs to a straight, and 1 out to a backdoor flush.

[/ QUOTE ]

You don't think we're being too generous with the outs to bottom two that put a 4-straight on, and outs to the nut-low end of a one-card straight with an OESD on board? Both in a large field?

[/ QUOTE ]

OK. Call it 1.5 out to the straight. While we are at it, the trip outs are probably closer to 1.8 outs. Or whatever. How does this change my argument? We are not folding; raising is better than calling.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-15-2005, 04:38 PM
J_V J_V is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,185
Default Re: 23s ...I know, I know: Fold PF

Preflop is a good call. Flop raise is probably bad. River raise is good.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.