Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-15-2005, 03:03 PM
thejameser thejameser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: I\'m a FAG:Frugal Aggressive(Not that there is anything wrong with that)
Posts: 410
Default Re: small pot w/overcards

to quote flair from earlier:

My typical line here is bet/bet/check, then make a grimace and ask the Dog "How could that Jackass call down with 22". She usually says "woof" and I agree.

this is USUALLY my line also. this was a change of pace play for me. i did not bet the flop to keep the pot small so i would have a better chance of stealing it. i reiterate, this is not how i normally play this hand, i am trying something different, which is why i posted this. anyway, i don't know if i liked the line either as it is giving the draws a free shot to hit. i should have checked the river, i think, in retrospect. sorry to respond so late, i had an emergency in the plant that pulled me out of the office. [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-15-2005, 03:19 PM
crunchy1 crunchy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boogie Woogie!!
Posts: 785
Default Re: small pot w/overcards

I'm less concerned with the lack of a flop bet than I am with you having placed a river bet. I don't think there's really anything wrong with taking a risk-free look at the turn when the flop missed you pretty bad. When it's checked to you again I like a bet. Obviously no one seems to like they're hand and any call is now getting ~1/4 of the odds they were getting on the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-15-2005, 03:30 PM
thejameser thejameser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: I\'m a FAG:Frugal Aggressive(Not that there is anything wrong with that)
Posts: 410
Default Re: small pot w/overcards

like i said, i agree with the river play. should have checked. i don't want that bet called, should never have made it. why even open myself up to a raise?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-15-2005, 03:59 PM
vincent vincent is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 0
Default Re: small pot w/overcards

why would you do that
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-15-2005, 04:10 PM
flair1239 flair1239 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 343
Default Re: small pot w/overcards

[ QUOTE ]
i should have checked the river, i think, in retrospect. sorry to respond so late, i had an emergency in the plant that pulled me out of the office. [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I hate it when my job interfers, with stdying small stakes poker. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-15-2005, 04:12 PM
chief444 chief444 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 211
Default Re: small pot w/overcards

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think there's really anything wrong with taking a risk-free look at the turn when the flop missed you pretty bad.

[/ QUOTE ]
Crunchy,

A 445 flop 3-handed isn't a total miss for AQ. It's actually a pretty good flop for AQ. It's most likely that it "missed" everyone and AQ is best.

Chief
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-15-2005, 04:13 PM
shant shant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 809
Default Re: small pot w/overcards

[ QUOTE ]
this is USUALLY my line also. this was a change of pace play for me. i did not bet the flop to keep the pot small so i would have a better chance of stealing it.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think this does the reverse. It shows your opponents you missed and you're likely to get called down by any pair now. I think this is a NL concept that doesn't apply here.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-15-2005, 04:15 PM
chesspain chesspain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 1,930
Default Re: small pot w/overcards

[ QUOTE ]
Not betting the flop is a glaring error.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-15-2005, 04:20 PM
chesspain chesspain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 1,930
Default Re: small pot w/overcards

[ QUOTE ]
i did not bet the flop to keep the pot small so i would have a better chance of stealing it.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is just foolish. Why would anyone put you on a pocket pair after you raise preflop and then check behind on this flop?




[ QUOTE ]
i reiterate, this is not how i normally play this hand, i am trying something different, which is why i posted this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, well I did acid a couple of times...but never took it again after I almost jumped in front of a bus to try to stop a bad trip. Some experiments are just stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-15-2005, 04:32 PM
thejameser thejameser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: I\'m a FAG:Frugal Aggressive(Not that there is anything wrong with that)
Posts: 410
Default Re: small pot w/overcards

thank you for your constructive criticism. its unbiased, concise delivery has allowed me to see the error in my ways. stupid, yes, most certainly. but apparantly i am a NL prodigy without even knowing it, so that is my NEW game. yahoo! ALL IN BABY!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.