|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Prerequisite To Discussing God
this is straightforwardly false, but then again, you knew that.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Prerequisite To Discussing God
I'll grant that you can take out the word "religion" from my original post.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Prerequisite To Discussing God
[ QUOTE ]
this is straightforwardly false, but then again, you knew that. [/ QUOTE ] I have too few posts to begin contradicting myself (by berating other posters), but was this an attempt at some kind of point? And if so what was it? Who was this even directed at, Sklansky or myself? Sorry If I come off as an ass but whatthewhodawhatee? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Prerequisite To Discussing God
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] this is straightforwardly false, but then again, you knew that. [/ QUOTE ] I have too few posts to begin contradicting myself (by berating other posters), but was this an attempt at some kind of point? And if so what was it? Who was this even directed at, Sklansky or myself? Sorry If I come off as an ass but whatthewhodawhatee? [/ QUOTE ] If you look at the “Re:” right above the body of the post (the heading, I guess we can call it) the screen name after the "Re" shows who it replies to. In this case, snowden719 is replying to Sklansky. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Prerequisite To Discussing God
like this?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Prerequisite To Discussing God
Exactly. But, I forgot to mention, you can only see the "Re:" while viewing posts in flat mode. Do you SEE why? LOL.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Prerequisite To Discussing God
And all this time!!!...............
|
|
|