Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-01-2005, 02:02 PM
bluefeet bluefeet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: galapagos islands of course
Posts: 825
Default Re: 66 behind a min raise (Party $55)


the 'position' you speak of is mute --

SB was the PF riaser.
the flop WILL have an over card to your 6's.
he WILL be betting on the flop.
you WILL be folding absent a flopped set (baring a blind push).
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-01-2005, 02:02 PM
Dr_Jeckyl_00 Dr_Jeckyl_00 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 222
Default Re: 66 behind a min raise (Party $55)

what is stop and go???
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-01-2005, 02:06 PM
Bigwig Bigwig is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 38
Default Re: 66 behind a min raise (Party $55)

[ QUOTE ]
what is stop and go???

[/ QUOTE ]

It's a play you can use when the following criteria are met:

You're first to act after the flop (in the BB, with the SB out of the hand).

You have a hand worth playing (equity wise) against the preflop raiser.

Your stack is not large enough to make the raiser fold (no fold equity).

You call the preflop raise, and lead out all-in on ANY flop. The idea is to gain some fold equity by hoping that the flop missed preflop raisers call. If they hit and call you, and you lose, no big deal, since you would've lost anyway had you gone all-in preflop.

This hand DOES NOT qualify for two reasons:

1) You will not be first to act after the flop.
2) You have fold equity preflop.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-01-2005, 02:06 PM
Meatmaw Meatmaw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 193
Default Re: 66 behind a min raise (Party $55)

Based on Bigwig's reply (and being too lazy to search), I would gather that it's where you are first to act and do not have much FE PF and you call a min raise, then push it all on the flop attempting to induce a fold based on a flop missing your opponent (rather than a small stacked push PF that encourages him to call you).

Did I win?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-01-2005, 02:08 PM
Meatmaw Meatmaw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 193
Default Re: 66 behind a min raise (Party $55)

guess i lost the reply race [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-01-2005, 02:08 PM
Dr_Jeckyl_00 Dr_Jeckyl_00 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 222
Default Re: 66 behind a min raise (Party $55)

the flop could also have an over card to the SB, and if he checks or puts a small bet in, you bet or raise... fold if reraised. If you have to fold you still have enough money to survive for a little while...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-01-2005, 02:21 PM
jzieg2313 jzieg2313 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 21
Default Re: 66 behind a min raise (Party $55)

Dude, I do not see how a call pre-flop, bet, and fold to a raise are all possible at this point. I think if he just calls and then loses more chips along the way he is just wasting chips. I think this is an easy PUSH! He isn't pot commited with his miny raise because you still have FE. Lose a third of your chips on this hand and you don't

JZ
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-01-2005, 06:40 PM
Fletch101 Fletch101 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 10
Default Re: 66 behind a min raise (Party $55)

Bigwig-

The poster meant that the mini-raiser would be using a S-n-Go like tactic by pushing on the flop regardless. That's why he said "which you can't call".
Of course, this situation does not fit the definition of a stop-n-go from any player's perspective.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would call here. He might be trying to steal, but he might not (raising opens you up to a re-raise). 66 is not that strong 9 handed, and if you push and are wrong you finish 9th. You will have position on him after the flop so you have a big advantage post flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think this is incorrect. Maybe the minraise indicates he doesn't know what he's doing, but I would guess if you call there's a LARGE possibility of a stop and go, which you can't call unless you set up or maybe get a 345 flop. I think calling is just chip spewing...

[/ QUOTE ]

NO STOP N' GO!!!!!!!

You are not first to act. You DO have fold equity preflop.

I'm beginning to hate the stop n' go listening to everybody recommend it every damn hand.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-01-2005, 06:52 PM
valenzuela valenzuela is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 453
Default Re: 66 behind a min raise (Party $55)

Push, no biithc is stealing my blinds with a min-bet.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-01-2005, 06:59 PM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 240
Default Re: 66 behind a min raise (Party $55)


I would go allin basically 100% of the time here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.