|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How many BB/100 is game selection worth?
i just go to the first available table with the largest pot on party. thats table selection i suppose but really all the games on party are good.
likewise all live games i have ever played in up to 30-60 have been good. so, while i dont think table selection (in and of itself) is overrated, i do think that the effort often put into is unnecessary. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How many BB/100 is game selection worth?
Its all a matter of risk/reward. Playing 2/4 full I used almost no game selection, this allowed me to keep my multi-tabling ratio around 7. If I had sat at only the juiciest tables I could probably only be playing hands at 5-6 tables on average (however you define juicy). I felt the extra hands played at mediocre tables more than made up for the higher overall quality of my opposition.
However, at 5/10 6max or something there are certainly tables where no number of hands could make it worth my while to sit - I'd be hardly +EV against a linup of TAG's and thinking LAGs, in that instance table selection is paramount. -SmileyEH |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How many BB/100 is game selection worth?
Table selection is worth a negative number if you are multitabling more than four.
-Michael |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How many BB/100 is game selection worth?
[ QUOTE ]
Table selection is worth a negative number if you are multitabling more than four. -Michael [/ QUOTE ] i find there's plenty of time for table selection while 4-tabling, and i doubt it would be -EV while 6+ tabling to leave tables where the tag/fish ratio is too high and open up new ones. this is one of the biggest advantages of playerview (and i assume gametime, though i've never used it myself). |
|
|