|
|
#2
05-19-2005, 04:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dif between s/s and s/s 2? (NLHE section)
[ QUOTE ]
Is there one? [/ QUOTE ] Yes!...wait....no. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] 
|
|
#5
05-20-2005, 05:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: dif between s/s and s/s 2? (NLHE section)
This have changed a little since SuperSystem 1. SuperSystem 2 is more suited for play in modern games. Plus the difference in authors has to be somewhat different. For example, I doubt Bobby Baldwin and Jennifer Harman play exactly the same.
|
|
#6
05-21-2005, 09:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: dif between s/s and s/s 2? (NLHE section)
[ QUOTE ]
This have changed a little since SuperSystem 1. SuperSystem 2 is more suited for play in modern games. Plus the difference in authors has to be somewhat different. For example, I doubt Bobby Baldwin and Jennifer Harman play exactly the same. [/ QUOTE ] No limit section, harman wrote limit section...
|
|
#8
05-22-2005, 09:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: dif between s/s and s/s 2? (NLHE section)
[ QUOTE ]
As did Baldwin, he was comparing the two books from that perspective. [/ QUOTE ] Well I thought the strategies Daniel Negreanu's section in SS2 was quite a bit different from David Sklansky's section in the first edition. Really opened my eyes. <font color="white"> Yes, I know they are different games, but this is about as relavant to the orignal post as talking about the limit hold'em sections </font>
|
|
#9
05-23-2005, 06:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: dif between s/s and s/s 2? (NLHE section)
[ QUOTE ]
This have changed a little since SuperSystem 1. SuperSystem 2 is more suited for play in modern games. [/ QUOTE ] You can tell this by the change is font, and the decrease in bold formatting. Bold is so old-fashioned.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
