Does anyone use a QUXGA monitor yet?

MowrMowr · #1 03-20-2005, 09:22 PM

16 tabling on one monitor would be pretty damned cool.

IBM Monitor

rerazor · #2 03-20-2005, 11:04 PM

Yeah, if you have bionic eyes.

ZBTHorton · #3 03-21-2005, 02:28 AM

What good would that resolution do?

Someone make me feel dumb.

emonrad87 · #4 03-21-2005, 02:38 AM

Would allow you to have 16 tables with no overlap (4x4), and a little space left over on the side.

_______________
|__|__|__|__| |
|__|__|__|__| |
|__|__|__|__| |
|__|__|__|__|_|

The tables would be very small in physical size tho.

slickpoppa · #5 03-21-2005, 02:53 AM

16 would be ridiculous, but 9 would be doable if you reduced the reolution accordingly

ZBTHorton · #6 03-21-2005, 02:59 AM

I understand that you could do 16 at a time, but you couldn't see the cards. I'm trying to figure out what purpose it filled period. For anyone.

contentless · #7 03-21-2005, 03:07 AM

Maybe digital video editing, for the new ultra-high res digital theatres.

jar · #8 03-21-2005, 11:57 AM

Medical imaging stuff and computer aided design, methinks.

NoTalent · #9 03-21-2005, 12:46 PM

You can get one on ebay for around $3500. I've seen them used for digital video. Crazy small pixels and a amazing screen. Not sure how it would work for poker.

callydrias · #10 03-21-2005, 01:16 PM

We have one of these monitors at my office (we do medical imaging). It's insane. The pixels are so small, you can barely read the standard-sized text on menus and buttons. Eventually, we just halved the resolution setting so we're not taking full advantage of its capabilities, but at least we can see what we're doing. I don't think I'd use this thing for poker...