2+2 Table NOW!>!>!>!>!>!>!

[topspin]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't see why people get so hung up on it having to be one or the other.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because lagfests suck for people whose bankroll is tight.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've often thought that it would be fun to have a 2+2 table at some nano-limit so that more people (like me!) could participate. This would have the added benefit that many low limits are not raked (e.g. Paradise .05/.1; I'm sure there's some Stars equivalent too).

Personally since I mostly play 1/2, the swings at a 2+2 table do make a noticeable difference to my bankroll. I'm sure I can't be the only micro poster to feel that way.

Maybe I'll try to start a nano table sometime when I'm less sleepy and see how well that works out [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]