Who Wants to Have a HU Tourney at Stars Like Right Now - Page 2

gumpzilla · #11 12-30-2005, 03:11 AM

Okay, how do we plan to organize this, though? (EDIT: Meaning it's pretty hard to coordinate that we'll actually be playing each other instead of random people, et cetera. Perhaps the 1-on-1 cash game tables? Downsides include rake and non-escalating blinds.) (EDIT 2: I'm interested if we can get this started in about the next 15 minutes.)

Unarmed · #12 12-30-2005, 03:29 AM

17250913 Dec 30 03:30 Unarmed's HU Challenge
Under Tourney/Private

But 3:30... hmmmm
Stupid stars.
edit : pwd - donkatrout

gumpzilla · #13 12-30-2005, 03:33 AM

Screw it, I'll play anyway.

Mr_J · #14 12-30-2005, 03:36 AM

I woulda been down...

CheckRaise · #15 12-30-2005, 03:37 AM

but?

johnnybeef · #16 12-30-2005, 03:37 AM

i have to duck out.....i only have 5.20 in my account. i was going to sit in a ring game to make the .05, but this is keeping me from doing so.

Maulik · #17 12-30-2005, 03:38 AM

this is going to be a short-handed tourney?

pergesu · #18 12-30-2005, 03:39 AM

As far as I know, it's a HU tourney. So if we get like 10 people to sign up, there will be 5 HU matches. Winners then play each other until I emerge as the ultimate champion.

Mr_J · #19 12-30-2005, 03:41 AM

Ok it's still being organized...

gumpzilla · #20 12-30-2005, 03:43 AM

[ QUOTE ]
As far as I know, it's a HU tourney. So if we get like 10 people to sign up, there will be 5 HU matches. Winners then play each other until I emerge as the ultimate champion.

[/ QUOTE ]

If 10 people showed up, I think 6 would get a bye and there would be 2 first round games. With 5 players, I've seen it give three byes and one game. This is a relatively obnoxious feature, but probably somewhat unavoidable.

Also, people should note that this is PL, not NL.