Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 05-02-2005, 04:57 PM
warlockjd warlockjd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 165
Default 2+2 article is all wrong? Deception in NL hold em.

http://www.twoplustwo.com/magazine/c...risse0505.html

I do not get this article at all. In fact, I disagree with most of it's premises, logic, and conlcusions. I tried to get some responses in the Magazine forum without success.

I am now pasting my response below

[ QUOTE ]
I disagree with this article almost entirely.

For some perspective, I play 6 max $400 NL on Party ($2/4 blinds). If I have a weak hand, I am betting strongly; If I have a medium hand, I am betting strongly; If I have a monster, I am betting strongly; If I have a gutshot with position, I am betting strongly. If I decide to bluff, I am bluffing strongly.

Anyone with me here? Perhaps this is just a more 6 max view, or perhaps I have a lot to learn. I am interested in others' viewpoints.


[/ QUOTE ]

Also, here is a response from fimbulwinter:

[ QUOTE ]
just a few gems:




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I cannot begin to imagine how slow playing could ever be "catastrophic," especially in no-limit, where there's plenty of time to get your opponents' chips in the middle.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More than anything though, it's critical that we not deceive ourselves into thinking that straightforward play is preferable in these games.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Your opponents will always be guessing, and the more they guess, the more often they guess wrongly.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



this article is one of the worst i've seen in the magazine yet. the whole thing sounds like the advice losing players give one another while at the table.

the very definition of a soft game is that the players don't know the proper plays. only when the players know about and make those proper plays should suboptimal plays be employed for the sake of deception.

fim


[/ QUOTE ]

I am hoping to get a discussion going here.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.