party 1000NL, 33, no set, out of position - Page 3

xorbie · #21 09-14-2005, 07:06 PM

[ QUOTE ]
i wouldnt have limped UTG with this garbage.
if the table is weak and im running it over, ill raise... but limping with 33 is not good, IMO.
REVERSE IMPLIED ODDS.
just say no to 22-55.

[/ QUOTE ]

What reverse implied odds? Set over set is pretty rare.

flawless_victory · #22 09-14-2005, 07:11 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i wouldnt have limped UTG with this garbage.
if the table is weak and im running it over, ill raise... but limping with 33 is not good, IMO.
REVERSE IMPLIED ODDS.
just say no to 22-55.

[/ QUOTE ]

What reverse implied odds? Set over set is pretty rare.

[/ QUOTE ]this is just something donkeys say, no offense.

AZK · #23 09-14-2005, 07:32 PM

[ QUOTE ]
just say no to 22-55.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, these are like my biggest winners. There's a reason why they round out the best 13 hands in No-Limit Texas Hold'em.

flawless_victory · #24 09-14-2005, 07:33 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
just say no to 22-55.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, these are like my biggest winners.

[/ QUOTE ]run good?

AZK · #25 09-14-2005, 07:37 PM

What are your top/favorite 13 hands? What are your top 13 winners? I think this should be the same list.

captZEEbo1 · #26 09-14-2005, 07:39 PM

EVERYONE I PLAY WITH < PLZ FOLD ALL SMALL PAIRS THEY SUCK!!!! KEEP PLAYING A8o and KTo TO RAISES!!! THAT'S HOW YOU WIN AT TEH HOLDEM, I MEAN HOW OFTEN DOES A PAIR WIN ANYWAYS? I FOLD ALL PAIRS PF UNLESS AA OR KK.

flawless_victory · #27 09-14-2005, 07:40 PM

[ QUOTE ]
What are your top 13 winners?

[/ QUOTE ]how the hell am i supposed to know?

hakeem · #28 09-14-2005, 08:04 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What are your top 13 winners?

[/ QUOTE ]how the hell am i supposed to know?

[/ QUOTE ]

modern software is great

AZK · #29 09-14-2005, 08:36 PM

I feel like this should be instinctive...the question is rhetorical. AA - 22 have to be the biggest winners long term, assuming we aren't retarded, right?

xorbie · #30 09-14-2005, 09:11 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i wouldnt have limped UTG with this garbage.
if the table is weak and im running it over, ill raise... but limping with 33 is not good, IMO.
REVERSE IMPLIED ODDS.
just say no to 22-55.

[/ QUOTE ]

What reverse implied odds? Set over set is pretty rare.

[/ QUOTE ]this is just something donkeys say, no offense.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why even bother saying "no offense" after calling me a donkey?

And I think it betrays a lack of understanding to talk about reverse implied odds with 22-55 against a raise with <100BB stacks.