Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-11-2005, 05:56 AM
cielo cielo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Default # of Omaha Starting hands

Not exactly probability but,

how many starting hands are possible in omaha if suits are not taken into account (like how they are listed in PTOmaha)?

So that A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 2 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

and
A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] A [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 2 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

are counted as the same hand.


Im not familiar with this kind of math, but my initial guesses were:

13*12*11*10

or

13^4

but i really am not sure.

If you do know how to figure this out, could you please explain it for me.

Thanks in advance

cielo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-11-2005, 09:44 AM
mostsmooth mostsmooth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: AC
Posts: 153
Default Re: # of Omaha Starting hands

not for nothing, but i believe your example hand IS counted as the same hand in PTO, but i could be wrong
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-11-2005, 10:23 AM
PygmyHero PygmyHero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 165
Default Re: # of Omaha Starting hands

The correct answer is

13^4 = 28,561

I think the best way to explain why is to use a HE example. We all know there are 169 different starting HE examples (again assuming K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] = K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] = any KQ suited, but is different than KQo). Your first card can be one of the 13 ranks. Your second card can be one of the 13 ranks (if we said twelve here then you could NEVER have a pocket pair). So,

13^2 = 169

Likewise for Omaha. If it were 13*12*11*10 then a hand like four aces would not be possible. In fact, your hand would always have four different ranks of cards.

In case you're interested, the number of Omaha starting hands if suits matter is

C(52,4) = 270,725
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-11-2005, 02:21 PM
Paul2432 Paul2432 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bryn Mawr, PA USA
Posts: 374
Default Re: # of Omaha Starting hands

The answer is 16432. You can do a search here or RGP for more details. This assumes that As2sAh3h is the same hand as Ad2dAc3c but a different hand from As2hAc3d. Your example was confusing about what "suits are not taken into account" means.

Paul

Edit: fixed suit typo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-11-2005, 02:35 PM
Paul2432 Paul2432 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bryn Mawr, PA USA
Posts: 374
Default Re: # of Omaha Starting hands

Your post contains several errors.

It is entirely coincidence that 13 x 13 = 169 = number of starting hands in hold'em.

The proper way to count hold'em starting hands is

Pairs = 13
Unpaired = 12+11+10+9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1 = 78
(this represents Ace + 12 lower ranked cards. King + 11 lower ranked cards . . .)

Unpaired hands can be suited or offsuit so total hands is equal to 78 + 78 + 13 = 169.

In order to count Omaha hands you would need to count separately quads, trips, two pair, one pair and no pair hands. Your method double (or more) counts many hands. For example, AAA3 would be counted four times (AAA3,AA3A, A3AA, and 3AAA).

Paul
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.