dont play at party...

[pokerjoker]

they have to lose players and money 'cause of this or they will stay split.

PS empire and Euro share at least some tables for sure.

[IggyWH]

[ QUOTE ]
they have to lose players and money 'cause of this or they will stay split.

PS empire and Euro share at least some tables for sure.

[/ QUOTE ]

The sad thing about all of this is they'll get away with it. The most important thing is fish, and Party has plenty of them. I've already transfered funds Party's way and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

[Zele]

While we're at it, let's get all the card counters to boycott casinos with crappy blackjack rules. That'll learn 'em!!

[threeonefour]

[ QUOTE ]
While we're at it, let's get all the card counters to boycott casinos with crappy blackjack rules. That'll learn 'em!!

[/ QUOTE ]

that is a very faulty analogy.

[SoftcoreRevolt]

Party's fish aren't as plump as the ones on Pacfic and Boss, and I can get nice rakeback deals on Boss anyway, so f- Party.

[Uglyowl]

I have found worse sites than Party for player skill, I am just pissed you guys will be looking now.

[Nicholasp27]

u can get rakeback on party as well...but not publicly advertised...

[radek2166]

I have yanked all my funds. Going to see where the dust settles.

[pokerjoker]

[ QUOTE ]
u can get rakeback on party as well...but not publicly advertised...

[/ QUOTE ]

do tell....

[Zele]

You're right - a lot of counter-favorable rules are also good for the casino's bottom line. A smart casino exec (such as Bill Zender) would recognize this and offer decent penetration, among other things.

Payment of rakeback is zero-sum; as long as there are plenty of non-sharp players around all day long and hence no need for pros to act as "game glue". 2+2'ers trying to exert leverage about this is even more futile than in my analogy.