#1
|
|||
|
|||
Anything wrong with this blind structure?
I've been playing at a NLHE home tourny game now for a few weeks now, usually 10-20$ buy-in. The game normally plays 7-8 handed. They use this blind structure.
25/50 to start. The blind gets raised every full rotation but only by 5 each, small and big blind. So it will go 30/55, 35/60, 40/65 etc etc, regardless of how many people are in it. When it's HU it just stays at whatever it was. How can I convince them to go with a more standard blind structure? Are there any advantages to going with the more normal structure? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Anything wrong with this blind structure?
thats a retarded structure.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Anything wrong with this blind structure?
The worst structure ever is the one I have played in a few times here in college, even though it's only a $5 buy in it's still stupid. The blinds go up every 25 minutes, until it gets down to 3-4 people, then the blinds go up "whenever someone goes out." And then heads up it switches to both players anteing. I try to tell everyone how dumb it is and how it defeats the purpose of blinds but no one listens. Then again it's $5.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Anything wrong with this blind structure?
[ QUOTE ]
thats a retarded structure. [/ QUOTE ] I concur. What a headache to keep up with. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Anything wrong with this blind structure?
[ QUOTE ]
thats a retarded structure. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. One of the regular tourneys I go to is $25 buy-in. Starts out .25/.25 blinds. Goes up to .25/.50 etc. every 30 minutes. 90 minutes of rebuys -- $15 for $25 in chips. Add on at end of rebuy period -- $10 for $25 in chips. Tell whoever is running it that it sucks and he should buy a f*cking timer already! The guy that runs my regular tourney uses homepokertourney -- http://www.homepokertourney.com/timer/timer_3_large.htm What a nightmare to have the blinds be at such odd numbers! Like usual, they never listen though. Most common answer: 'I've been doing it like this for 100 years! Nobody has EVER complained!' |
|
|