|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hand played by a NL \"forum expert\" that made no sense to me
MP1 is a well known and respected poster in the NL forum. He also talks a decent amount of trash and plays pretty aggro which is why this hand surprised me. MP1 starts this hand with 2491 and SB has 2020. Converter is all [censored] up, so I had to add in any action where money was put in the pot for some reason.
Party Poker (10 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is BB with J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">5 folds</font>, UTG calls, MP1 calls, CO calls, SB completes, Hero checks. Flop: 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font> SB bets 100, Hero folds, UTG folds, MP1 calls, CO folds. Turn: 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> SB bets 325, MP1 calls. River: 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> SB bets 525, MP1 calls. Final Pot: $1997 won by MP1, a 2+2er with 555!? SB shows a befuddled 95s and loses to this strangely played bottom set. Am I wrong or is this just absolutely brutal? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand played by a NL \"forum expert\" that made no sense to me
surely this isn't flex?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand played by a NL \"forum expert\" that made no sense to me
I thought he had quads.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand played by a NL \"forum expert\" that made no sense to me
[ QUOTE ]
I thought he had quads. [/ QUOTE ] You see why he was voted SSNL forum big dick? Xorbie rules. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand played by a NL \"forum expert\" that made no sense to me
this is a very dumb post. poker is more than a party poker hand history.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand played by a NL \"forum expert\" that made no sense to me
[ QUOTE ]
this is a very dumb post. poker is more than a party poker hand history. [/ QUOTE ] Okay. As I am trying to learn how to play NL, and I see someone who is supposed to be crushing the game make a play like this - I get curious as to why it might be so. I can usually come up with a rationalization for strange plays - but for this one I can't. I'm just wondering if there is one. To get better, I study plays by players that I assume are better than I am in order to improve and think outside the box. This one just doesn't make sense to me, though. -James |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand played by a NL \"forum expert\" that made no sense to me
Sorry for the harsh post. I was very pissed off for other reasons last night. Anyway, it's very plausible said 2+2'er had a good read on villain and was justified in playing that way. When you see only the hand history none of that shows. Poker is an extremely situational game and NL is probably the most situational of all.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand played by a NL \"forum expert\" that made no sense to me
Very odd. I would very much like to hear an explanation as well.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand played by a NL \"forum expert\" that made no sense to me
the range of hands this guy is betting full pot with is something like 2 pair, a set, a straight, or an overpair... as he continues to put on full heat when there is such a dry board, it feels less and less like an overpair, thus narrowing down his hand range significantly... out of 2 pair, set, straifght, i can think of one that isn't calling a significant raise and two that are, you catching my drift? i think this hand was played fine, mp1 got value do to the other guy's aggression and lost the least versus the hands that would actually call a raise. prudent but that's not a bad idea given this flop texture.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand played by a NL \"forum expert\" that made no sense to me
[ QUOTE ]
the range of hands this guy is betting full pot with is something like 2 pair, a set, a straight, or an overpair... as he continues to put on full heat when there is such a dry board, it feels less and less like an overpair, thus narrowing down his hand range significantly... out of 2 pair, set, straifght, i can think of one that isn't calling a significant raise and two that are, you catching my drift? i think this hand was played fine, mp1 got value do to the other guy's aggression and lost the least versus the hands that would actually call a raise. prudent but that's not a bad idea given this flop texture. [/ QUOTE ] a perfect definition of pwnage |
|
|